RIP Net Neutrality (in America)

bloop bloop blah
User avatar
Captain Roy Bringus
Registered Broad
Posts: 1755
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:30 pm
Received rep: 1 time

RIP Net Neutrality (in America)

Post #1 by Captain Roy Bringus » Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:27 am

http://www.theverge.com/2014/1/14/5307650/federal-court-strikes-down-net-neutrality-rules

:(

A federal appeals court has struck down important segments of the FCC's Open Internet rules, determining that the agency doesn't have the power to require internet service providers to treat all traffic equally. The DC circuit court has ruled on Verizon v. FCC, a challenge to the net neutrality rules put in place in 2010, vacating the FCC's anti-discrimination and anti-blocking policies, though it preserved disclosure requirements that Verizon opposed — in other words, carriers can make some traffic run faster or block other services, but they have to tell subscribers.

The problem isn't that the court opposed the FCC's goals, it's that unlike older telecommunications providers, ISPs aren't classified as "common carriers" that must pass information through their networks without preference. By enforcing net neutrality, the court found, the agency was imposing rules that didn't apply to carriers. It's an issue that net neutrality supporters have been worried about for years: "The FCC — under the leadership of former Chairman Julius Genachowski — made a grave mistake when it failed to ground its Open Internet rules on solid legal footing," says Free Press president Craig Aaron. "Internet users will pay dearly for the previous chairman's lack of political will."

Despite striking down parts of the rules, Judge David Tatel said that the FCC should have some authority to regulate service providers. The FCC initially got around the common carrier problem by saying that the Open Internet order promotes broadband development, an explicit agency goal. While opponents of net neutrality have said that there's little evidence these rules actually help, Tatel disagreed, saying that the idea was "both rational and supported by substantial evidence." Verizon also argued that Congress was responsible for passing regulations, but "although regulation of broadband Internet providers certainly involves decisions of great 'economic and political significance' ... we have little reason given this history to think that Congress could not have delegated some of these decisions to the Commission."

Unfortunately for the commission, the particular rules it tried to make — anti-blocking and anti-discrimination rules — were expressly allowed only for common carriers.

FCC chair Tom Wheeler said that the agency would continue the fight, though it's not clear exactly how. "I am committed to maintaining our networks as engines for economic growth, test beds for innovative services and products, and channels for all forms of speech protected by the First Amendment. We will consider all available options, including those for appeal, to ensure that these networks on which the Internet depends continue to provide a free and open platform for innovation and expression, and operate in the interest of all Americans."

Return to “bleetbloop”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest