Eh-Oh-Canada-Go

bloop bloop blah
User avatar
Sturminator
Registered Broad
Posts: 983
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:55 am
Received rep: 10 times

Post #2901 by Sturminator » Tue Feb 03, 2015 11:50 am

Image
If a man were permitted to make all the ballads, he need not care who should make the laws of a nation.
User avatar
AD
Posts: 27090
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Here
Has given rep: 1157 times
Received rep: 1367 times

Post #2902 by AD » Tue Feb 03, 2015 12:55 pm

Move to ban Matlhus.
User avatar
AD
Posts: 27090
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Here
Has given rep: 1157 times
Received rep: 1367 times

Post #2903 by AD » Tue Feb 03, 2015 1:19 pm

I'm going to say something hurtful, but it comes from a place of love.

When Shredder does this, he summarizes the interesting points, asks questions and attempts to reduce the reading material. So he's actually doing it much better than you.

Love,

AD
User avatar
Craig
Registered Broad
Posts: 22654
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:33 pm
Location: Guelph
Has given rep: 90 times
Received rep: 1014 times

Post #2904 by Craig » Tue Feb 03, 2015 1:29 pm

Big#D wrote:i don't mind, tommy. i just read what i want and ignore the rest. apparently the others aren't as strong willed.


I can't be bothered to click on the links to find out if I want to read it.
User avatar
AD
Posts: 27090
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Here
Has given rep: 1157 times
Received rep: 1367 times

Post #2905 by AD » Tue Feb 03, 2015 1:30 pm

Big#D wrote:i don't mind, tommy. i just read what i want and ignore the rest. apparently the others aren't as strong willed.


I ignore everything.
User avatar
AD
Posts: 27090
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Here
Has given rep: 1157 times
Received rep: 1367 times

Post #2906 by AD » Tue Feb 03, 2015 1:31 pm

Big#D wrote:so, you have more will power than the banana then.


No I have too much willpower. The problem is I'd like to know what I'm about to read before so I can make educated choices where i'm clicking.

I'm no click-slut. I don't just jump at the first link.
User avatar
AD
Posts: 27090
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Here
Has given rep: 1157 times
Received rep: 1367 times

Post #2907 by AD » Tue Feb 03, 2015 1:37 pm

Thank you.

We push because we love. And we're counting on you. I can't be bothered to read whole paragraphs anymore. I actually have people that do that for me at work (not kidding). And when I don't have it in-house, I get my employer to pay 3-400 an hour for people to read and summarize stuff for me.

So goddamnit, I'm not gonna start doing it on broads. All the reading I do is on planes when waiting for lift-off. That's it.
User avatar
Craig
Registered Broad
Posts: 22654
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:33 pm
Location: Guelph
Has given rep: 90 times
Received rep: 1014 times

Post #2908 by Craig » Tue Feb 03, 2015 2:08 pm

I like Ted Hsu. Kingston and the Islands has a history of producing pretty good MPs.
User avatar
MP
Registered Broad
Posts: 18626
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 1:13 pm
Location: :uoıʇɐɔoן
Has given rep: 182 times
Received rep: 839 times

Post #2909 by MP » Tue Feb 03, 2015 2:39 pm

Craig wrote:I like Ted Hsu. Kingston and the Islands has a history of producing pretty good MPs.


Except he quit, and now Garretson Jr. is taking over.
User avatar
MP
Registered Broad
Posts: 18626
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 1:13 pm
Location: :uoıʇɐɔoן
Has given rep: 182 times
Received rep: 839 times

Post #2910 by MP » Tue Feb 03, 2015 2:42 pm

Big#D wrote:i still don't get why they can't gather the data for the census (actually both the long and short form) from the data they already have and/or build it into the data they already collect.

income data can be compiled in an anonymous way by the filing of tax forms, especially if you make filing them mandatory.
build a mechanism in there for other data they might need.


if they can overcome the need for a census every decade, they can have more accurate, more timely information and see real trends. it's the fucking 21st century for fuck sakes.


How is Jesus supposed to return without a census taking place?
User avatar
AD
Posts: 27090
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Here
Has given rep: 1157 times
Received rep: 1367 times

Post #2911 by AD » Tue Feb 03, 2015 2:59 pm

Thomas Malthus wrote:I'd prefer he return April 1st and start off the government fiscal year right.


Are you saying Jesus's resurrection is a joke?
User avatar
Craig
Registered Broad
Posts: 22654
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:33 pm
Location: Guelph
Has given rep: 90 times
Received rep: 1014 times

Post #2912 by Craig » Tue Feb 03, 2015 3:21 pm

MP wrote:Except he quit, and now Garretson Jr. is taking over.


I like him too, until proven otherwise. I don't know a whole lot about him. His dad didn't bug me too much, so that's something.
User avatar
AD
Posts: 27090
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Here
Has given rep: 1157 times
Received rep: 1367 times

Post #2913 by AD » Tue Feb 03, 2015 3:46 pm

Hey that was like, for a few months or something. Not that I care.

:colbert:
User avatar
AD
Posts: 27090
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Here
Has given rep: 1157 times
Received rep: 1367 times

Post #2914 by AD » Tue Feb 03, 2015 3:46 pm

A few years tops!
User avatar
AD
Posts: 27090
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Here
Has given rep: 1157 times
Received rep: 1367 times

Post #2915 by AD » Tue Feb 03, 2015 3:48 pm

This is the perfect year for this to happen for me. S was on mat leave so there is a significant wage gap for 2014. I should not have bought so much RRSPs back in mid-2014.
User avatar
AD
Posts: 27090
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Here
Has given rep: 1157 times
Received rep: 1367 times

Post #2916 by AD » Tue Feb 03, 2015 3:49 pm

If the Conservatives weren't all douchey asshole secretive mismanaging incompetent lying cheating criminal religious whackos, I'd totally consider voting for them on this point.
User avatar
AD
Posts: 27090
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Here
Has given rep: 1157 times
Received rep: 1367 times

Post #2917 by AD » Tue Feb 03, 2015 4:13 pm

Dog wrote:Differ them to 2015.


Good idea.
User avatar
mayoradamwest
Registered Broad
Posts: 13323
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:38 pm
Has given rep: 783 times
Received rep: 558 times

Post #2918 by mayoradamwest » Tue Feb 03, 2015 4:21 pm

Sad to see the CPC lose one of their best MPs.
User avatar
AD
Posts: 27090
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Here
Has given rep: 1157 times
Received rep: 1367 times

Post #2919 by AD » Tue Feb 03, 2015 4:31 pm

You mean defer (to put off; postpone) right doggie? Not differ (To be dissimilar or unlike in nature, quality, amount, or form).
User avatar
Craig
Registered Broad
Posts: 22654
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:33 pm
Location: Guelph
Has given rep: 90 times
Received rep: 1014 times

Post #2920 by Craig » Tue Feb 03, 2015 4:33 pm

If you defer, can you change your mind later and have it count against 2014? Deferring only makes sense if income splitting comes in. It's kinda risky to try that without knowing.
User avatar
AD
Posts: 27090
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Here
Has given rep: 1157 times
Received rep: 1367 times

Post #2921 by AD » Tue Feb 03, 2015 4:34 pm

Craig wrote:If you defer, can you change your mind later and have it count against 2014? Deferring only makes sense if income splitting comes in. It's kinda risky to try that without knowing.


Income splitting is already here no?
User avatar
Craig
Registered Broad
Posts: 22654
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:33 pm
Location: Guelph
Has given rep: 90 times
Received rep: 1014 times

Post #2922 by Craig » Tue Feb 03, 2015 4:37 pm

AD wrote:Income splitting is already here no?


It's going in the next budget, then we have an election. If anyone but the Cons win, I think it's gone.
senate
Registered Broad
Posts: 11888
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:36 am
Has given rep: 301 times
Received rep: 831 times

Post #2923 by senate » Tue Feb 03, 2015 4:38 pm

[CENTER]Image[/CENTER]
User avatar
AD
Posts: 27090
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Here
Has given rep: 1157 times
Received rep: 1367 times

Post #2924 by AD » Tue Feb 03, 2015 4:41 pm

Big#D wrote:no budget, no split.


What!?
User avatar
Craig
Registered Broad
Posts: 22654
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:33 pm
Location: Guelph
Has given rep: 90 times
Received rep: 1014 times

Post #2925 by Craig » Tue Feb 03, 2015 4:41 pm

Although they already announced the capped version for the 2014 tax year, didn't they? I suppose that one we're stuck with, no?
User avatar
AD
Posts: 27090
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Here
Has given rep: 1157 times
Received rep: 1367 times

Post #2926 by AD » Tue Feb 03, 2015 4:43 pm

It is effective as of the 2014 tax year. My 2014 return is going in before the next election. So I don't see how this might be retro-actively denied. I'll get my deduction and corelative tax return way before the Cons get defeated.

I don't care for it for 2015 because my wife will be back to close to par with me. (Not quite but close).
User avatar
Craig
Registered Broad
Posts: 22654
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:33 pm
Location: Guelph
Has given rep: 90 times
Received rep: 1014 times

Post #2927 by Craig » Tue Feb 03, 2015 4:44 pm

AD wrote:It is effective as of the 2014 tax year. My 2014 return is going in before the next election. So I don't see how this might be retro-actively denied. I'll get my deduction and corelative tax return way before the Cons get defeated.

I don't care for it for 2015 because my wife will be back to close to par with me. (Not quite but close).


Enjoy your at most $2k. You absolutely do not deserve it.
User avatar
AD
Posts: 27090
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Here
Has given rep: 1157 times
Received rep: 1367 times

Post #2928 by AD » Tue Feb 03, 2015 4:46 pm

Craig wrote:Enjoy your at most $2k. You absolutely do not deserve it.


Thank you. It's going straight to my TSFA! Or maybe I'll go wild and make an extra mortgage payment. Whoo-wha! The endless possibilities!
User avatar
AD
Posts: 27090
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Here
Has given rep: 1157 times
Received rep: 1367 times

Post #2929 by AD » Tue Feb 03, 2015 4:46 pm

Big#D wrote:they can't retroactively change the tax act to tax previous years' incomes (well, they probably could, but it'd be political suicide). i think whomever gets in in 2015 will have a hard enough time with changing the 2015 tax year let alone 2014.


Exactly, so what the hell were you guys arguing?

Return to “bleetbloop”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest