Epic Sergei Makarov post

From the Creamery Kings to the Salary Cap....
User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 21944
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 126 times
Received rep: 361 times

Epic Sergei Makarov post

Post #1 by Dr_Chimera » Mon Nov 02, 2015 7:57 pm

I really like this post. Someone took their time. http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showp ... stcount=50
User avatar
PPJ
Registered Broad
Posts: 24275
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:48 pm
Location: The Cesspool
Has given rep: 79 times
Received rep: 126 times

Re: Epic Sergei Makarov post

Post #2 by PPJ » Wed Nov 04, 2015 8:21 am

Best eligible player not in the Hall of Fame. Obviously the likes of Dick Duff and Clark Gillies were better hockey players. The Hall would never lie.
User avatar
The Bytown Boozer
Registered Broad
Posts: 1861
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 4:29 am
Has given rep: 262 times
Received rep: 155 times
Contact:

Re: Epic Sergei Makarov post

Post #3 by The Bytown Boozer » Wed Nov 04, 2015 4:27 pm

HFBoards, despite its glaring flaws, is still a great place to talk about the international game.

You just hafta stay away from the Scandinavian pissing contests.
User avatar
mcphee
Registered Broad
Posts: 36696
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:27 am
Has given rep: 164 times
Received rep: 381 times

Re: Epic Sergei Makarov post

Post #4 by mcphee » Thu Nov 05, 2015 8:30 am

Psycho Papa Joe wrote:Best eligible player not in the Hall of Fame. Obviously the likes of Dick Duff and Clark Gillies were better hockey players. The Hall would never lie.


In style, wouldn't Lafleur be a good comparable for Makarov ? I remember him as a player that if you did everything right against him, all game, at one point he'd make a play and beat you.

My problem in evaluating great int'l players is that we judge from different criteria, at least I do. Take Duff and Gillies, if you saw the players, you'd follow their games through long seasons, leading into playoffs and get an idea whether they ranked with the best as the games got more important. The season and playoffs were the meal, int'l tournaments were dessert.

From a different perspective, those tournaments were the main course. It'd be ridiculous to try and mount any kind of argument that the Duffs' and Gillies' of the world were close to the player Makarov was but my guess is that guys voting remembered them as key parts of Stanley Cup winning teams.

A Mtl radio guy has always used the hof criteria as simply saying the guy's name and giving a quick answer, hof'er or not ? Makarov obviously is.

I'm not really for or against the other guys being there, some guys need to have their accomplishments subjected to some analysis before people realize all that they accomplished, but some guys are obvious.
User avatar
PPJ
Registered Broad
Posts: 24275
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:48 pm
Location: The Cesspool
Has given rep: 79 times
Received rep: 126 times

Re: Epic Sergei Makarov post

Post #5 by PPJ » Thu Nov 05, 2015 9:52 am

mcphee wrote:
Psycho Papa Joe wrote:Best eligible player not in the Hall of Fame. Obviously the likes of Dick Duff and Clark Gillies were better hockey players. The Hall would never lie.


In style, wouldn't Lafleur be a good comparable for Makarov ? I remember him as a player that if you did everything right against him, all game, at one point he'd make a play and beat you.

My problem in evaluating great int'l players is that we judge from different criteria, at least I do. Take Duff and Gillies, if you saw the players, you'd follow their games through long seasons, leading into playoffs and get an idea whether they ranked with the best as the games got more important. The season and playoffs were the meal, int'l tournaments were dessert.

From a different perspective, those tournaments were the main course. It'd be ridiculous to try and mount any kind of argument that the Duffs' and Gillies' of the world were close to the player Makarov was but my guess is that guys voting remembered them as key parts of Stanley Cup winning teams.

A Mtl radio guy has always used the hof criteria as simply saying the guy's name and giving a quick answer, hof'er or not ? Makarov obviously is.

I'm not really for or against the other guys being there, some guys need to have their accomplishments subjected to some analysis before people realize all that they accomplished, but some guys are obvious.


The Hall should just say it's a NA HOF and be done with it, but they opened the door by allowing non-NHLers like Tretiak and Kharlamov in. Sure those two did great things in games against Canada, but so did Makarov. Other than Gretzky, was there a better forward in the world in the 80's, beginning to end? If they allow those two in, there simply is no sane argument to exclude Makarov, who's sole mistake seems to have not had a chance to play for the Wings like Fetisov and Larionov did. Really, in what universe was Larionov ever a better player than Makarov? Larionov was basically to Makarov what Lemaire was to Lafleur going back to your example.

As for Duff, you saw him and others, but I have a hard time thinking he was a better player than his non-HOF teammates, JC Tremblay and Provost just going by the stories my dad used to tell me. Am I wrong on that?
User avatar
mcphee
Registered Broad
Posts: 36696
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:27 am
Has given rep: 164 times
Received rep: 381 times

Re: Epic Sergei Makarov post

Post #6 by mcphee » Thu Nov 05, 2015 10:28 am

Psycho Papa Joe wrote:
mcphee wrote:
Psycho Papa Joe wrote:Best eligible player not in the Hall of Fame. Obviously the likes of Dick Duff and Clark Gillies were better hockey players. The Hall would never lie.


In style, wouldn't Lafleur be a good comparable for Makarov ? I remember him as a player that if you did everything right against him, all game, at one point he'd make a play and beat you.

My problem in evaluating great int'l players is that we judge from different criteria, at least I do. Take Duff and Gillies, if you saw the players, you'd follow their games through long seasons, leading into playoffs and get an idea whether they ranked with the best as the games got more important. The season and playoffs were the meal, int'l tournaments were dessert.

From a different perspective, those tournaments were the main course. It'd be ridiculous to try and mount any kind of argument that the Duffs' and Gillies' of the world were close to the player Makarov was but my guess is that guys voting remembered them as key parts of Stanley Cup winning teams.

A Mtl radio guy has always used the hof criteria as simply saying the guy's name and giving a quick answer, hof'er or not ? Makarov obviously is.

I'm not really for or against the other guys being there, some guys need to have their accomplishments subjected to some analysis before people realize all that they accomplished, but some guys are obvious.


The Hall should just say it's a NA HOF and be done with it, but they opened the door by allowing non-NHLers like Tretiak and Kharlamov in. Sure those two did great things in games against Canada, but so did Makarov. Other than Gretzky, was there a better forward in the world in the 80's, beginning to end? If they allow those two in, there simply is no sane argument to exclude Makarov, who's sole mistake seems to have not had a chance to play for the Wings like Fetisov and Larionov did. Really, in what universe was Larionov ever a better player than Makarov? Larionov was basically to Makarov what Lemaire was to Lafleur going back to your example.

As for Duff, you saw him and others, but I have a hard time thinking he was a better player than his non-HOF teammates, JC Tremblay and Provost just going by the stories my dad used to tell me. Am I wrong on that?


Duff was a lot like Justin Williams. Clever player, played better in big games, complimented good players as a linemate. Excelled on great Leaf team of the early 60's as well as great CH team of mid to late 60's. I think being in the hall for him is a bit of a stretch, if he toiled on the Rangers on the periphery of great teams, he'd not be there. He did win though so...

Provost was a great checking forward who'd score. I'm sure that when Gainey was drafted, Bowman thought that he had his Claude Provost. JC Tremblay was a great d man, he'd be earning 7-8M today. He wasn't very popular because he shied away from the rough stuff, and I get the impression he was a bit of a different type, but there are far worse d men in the hall than him. Being Habs probably hurt them, probably felt that you couldn't induct them all.
User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 21944
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 126 times
Received rep: 361 times

Re: Epic Sergei Makarov post

Post #7 by Dr_Chimera » Fri Nov 06, 2015 2:08 am

I think HHOF's criteria for inducting non-NHLer Euros is that these Euros have to be important newsmakers in the West.
User avatar
The Bytown Boozer
Registered Broad
Posts: 1861
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 4:29 am
Has given rep: 262 times
Received rep: 155 times
Contact:

Re: Epic Sergei Makarov post

Post #8 by The Bytown Boozer » Fri Nov 06, 2015 5:43 am

Image
User avatar
PPJ
Registered Broad
Posts: 24275
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:48 pm
Location: The Cesspool
Has given rep: 79 times
Received rep: 126 times

Re: Epic Sergei Makarov post

Post #9 by PPJ » Fri Nov 06, 2015 12:49 pm

Dr_Chimera wrote:I think HHOF's criteria for inducting non-NHLer Euros is that these Euros have to be important newsmakers in the West.


Yeah, Mcphee already said that Doc. Jeez.

That said, I look at the numbers and Makarov did more in CCCP vs NHL games than Kharlamov did. Should have got Messier to break his ankle in one of the Canada Cups I guess and be some sort of hockey martyr like Kharlamov. He'd be in the Hall for sure.

PS Does anybody know if Makarov gives a shit?
User avatar
PPJ
Registered Broad
Posts: 24275
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:48 pm
Location: The Cesspool
Has given rep: 79 times
Received rep: 126 times

Re: Epic Sergei Makarov post

Post #10 by PPJ » Fri Nov 06, 2015 12:50 pm

The Bytown Boozer wrote:Image


Real men don't need no stinkin mask.
User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 21944
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 126 times
Received rep: 361 times

Re: Epic Sergei Makarov post

Post #11 by Dr_Chimera » Sun Nov 08, 2015 9:20 pm

LOL I phrased it way better, Joseph.
User avatar
The Bytown Boozer
Registered Broad
Posts: 1861
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 4:29 am
Has given rep: 262 times
Received rep: 155 times
Contact:

Re: Epic Sergei Makarov post

Post #12 by The Bytown Boozer » Tue Sep 20, 2016 4:03 am

keshymarkyz
Registered Broad
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 7:26 am
Contact:

Re: Epic Sergei Makarov post

Post #13 by keshymarkyz » Thu Apr 05, 2018 7:30 am

All of that diggy would pleasure more and more seriously :spam:
User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 21944
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 126 times
Received rep: 361 times

Re: Epic Sergei Makarov post

Post #14 by Dr_Chimera » Fri Apr 06, 2018 9:41 pm

I think due to the last update they did HFBoards lost half of their threads. That's karma, I guess.

Return to “Hockey's Past”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest