Page 84 of 85

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 8:10 am
by Transplanted Caper
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... phic-tweet

The Texas senator Ted Cruz has been asked to explain himself after his official account “liked” a pornographic tweet.

Although liking a Twitter post does not necessarily share it, the tweet became available to view on Cruz’s verified profile, leading to series of awkward screenshots.

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:47 am
by Dynrehab
"There is no substantive due process right to stimulate one’s genitals for non-medical purposes unrelated to procreation or outside of an interpersonal relationship."

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 12:51 pm
by akiberg
the guardian.
sigh
I do hope you fuckernauts read harder.

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 1:08 pm
by WTF
Granted, The Guardian doesn't carry the same journalistic weight as The Onion but then again, who does?

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 5:48 pm
by clawfirst
Wait do you dispute the plethora of screen shot evidence?

He made an oopsy and fat fingered the like button. No big deal...unless of course your base are a bunch of jesus banging retards.

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 5:48 pm
by clawfirst
Oh that might be problem then.

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 8:07 pm
by mooseOAK
They voted for Trump. What's a little incest porn in comparison?

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 8:53 pm
by Craig
I like incest porn way more than I like Trump.

Heck, his family could make a decent incest porn. Much better than they govern.

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:07 pm
by Dynrehab
akiberg wrote:the guardian.
sigh
I do hope you fuckernauts read harder.


Or not take it any more serious than a small chuckle.

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:21 pm
by Transplanted Caper
Oh Aki, you dumb mother fucker. So against us you side with Ted Cruz accidentally liking some porn.

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:16 pm
by akiberg
Transplanted Caper wrote:Oh Aki, you dumb mother fucker. So against us you side with Ted Cruz accidentally liking some porn.

wow, that's quite the leap of logic now.
good for you. that you read the guardian actually makes a lot of sense.
i think the tweety thing was quite funny. unbunch your panties.

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:30 pm
by akiberg
clawfirst wrote:Wait do you dispute the plethora of screen shot evidence?

He made an oopsy and fat fingered the like button. No big deal...unless of course your base are a bunch of jesus banging retards.

no
I simply made a comment about the guardian.
maybe cool your jets, serpico

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 4:00 pm
by Craig

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 7:06 pm
by akiberg
what a pile of horseshit that article was. I had to stop reading it.
thanks for sharing?

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 7:11 pm
by clawfirst
Be more specific. What, other than the writing(I hate the current partisan medias persuasive essay bullshit style) didnt you agree with?

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 7:32 pm
by akiberg
clawfirst wrote:Be more specific. What, other than the writing(I hate the current partisan medias persuasive essay bullshit style) didnt you agree with?

the style for sure. the idiotic pretense that a democrats shit doesn't stink wore thin quite quickly too.
it's pure drivel

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 7:44 pm
by clawfirst
I long for boring real journalism.

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 7:44 pm
by clawfirst
REAL NEWS

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 8:49 pm
by vf
US Congress passes bipartisan resolution pressing Trump to go after neo Nazis and white nationalists. Declares the event where Heather Heyer was murdered as domestic terrorism. No mention of antifa though. Weird.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-con ... /text?r=95

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:44 pm
by clawfirst
White terrorists? U wot mate

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:47 pm
by paulster
Before 9/11 all terrorists in movies were white eastern European types, like Die Hard. After 9/11 all terrorists in movies are brown. What'supwiththat?

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 2:52 am
by akiberg
vf wrote:US Congress passes bipartisan resolution pressing Trump to go after neo Nazis and white nationalists. Declares the event where Heather Heyer was murdered as domestic terrorism. No mention of antifa though. Weird.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-con ... /text?r=95

bipartisan? you can't be serious.
well I guess that does it then. libtards unite.
lol

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 9:07 am
by vf
akiberg wrote:
vf wrote:US Congress passes bipartisan resolution pressing Trump to go after neo Nazis and white nationalists. Declares the event where Heather Heyer was murdered as domestic terrorism. No mention of antifa though. Weird.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-con ... /text?r=95

bipartisan? you can't be serious.
well I guess that does it then. libtards unite.
lol


Maybe you don't know what the word means? Here, let me help:

Definition of bipartisan
:of, relating to, or involving members of two parties

a bipartisan commission

; specifically :marked by or involving cooperation, agreement, and compromise between two major political parties

bipartisan support for the bill



Republicans have control of their Upper and Lower Houses. For a Democrat bill to pass it requires bipartisan support.

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:50 pm
by akiberg
vf wrote:
akiberg wrote:
vf wrote:US Congress passes bipartisan resolution pressing Trump to go after neo Nazis and white nationalists. Declares the event where Heather Heyer was murdered as domestic terrorism. No mention of antifa though. Weird.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-con ... /text?r=95

bipartisan? you can't be serious.
well I guess that does it then. libtards unite.
lol


Maybe you don't know what the word means? Here, let me help:

Definition of bipartisan
:of, relating to, or involving members of two parties

a bipartisan commission

; specifically :marked by or involving cooperation, agreement, and compromise between two major political parties

bipartisan support for the bill



Republicans have control of their Upper and Lower Houses. For a Democrat bill to pass it requires bipartisan support.

that's not why I'm laughing. try reading harder.
oh, and thanks for the websters, tips

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 4:15 pm
by vf
Reading something that's not there again I see. Hopefully one day they'll discover a cure for you Aki-Petteri Berg.

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 5:51 pm
by akiberg
vf wrote:Reading something that's not there again I see. Hopefully one day they'll discover a cure for you Aki-Petteri Berg.

it's all there.
for some reason you just choose not to see it.

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 6:08 pm
by Craig
Yeah, only an idiot would interpret

bipartisan? you can't be serious.
well I guess that does it then. libtards unite.
lol

As being about bipartisanship.

:paranoid:

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 6:33 pm
by clawfirst
Ya im not sure aki even read the thing. Must be caught in an echo chamber loop

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 6:33 pm
by clawfirst
Teach me what youre seeing like im 5 aki

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 10:01 pm
by akiberg
Craig wrote:Yeah, only an idiot would interpret

bipartisan? you can't be serious.
well I guess that does it then. libtards unite.
lol

As being about bipartisanship.

:paranoid:

you don't see it either?
shocking.
how are the rrsp's?

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 10:02 pm
by akiberg
clawfirst wrote:Teach me what youre seeing like im 5 aki

nah, not worth it.

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 10:04 pm
by akiberg
clawfirst wrote:Ya im not sure aki even read the thing. Must be caught in an echo chamber loop

I read it.
you?

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 10:07 pm
by Craig
akiberg wrote:
Craig wrote:Yeah, only an idiot would interpret

bipartisan? you can't be serious.
well I guess that does it then. libtards unite.
lol

As being about bipartisanship.

:paranoid:

you don't see it either?
shocking.
how are the rrsp's?


I'm sure it's everyone but you, just like every other time.

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 10:34 pm
by clawfirst
akiberg wrote:
clawfirst wrote:Teach me what youre seeing like im 5 aki

nah, not worth it.

C'mon make 3% effort.

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 12:50 am
by akiberg
Craig wrote:
akiberg wrote:
Craig wrote:Yeah, only an idiot would interpret

bipartisan? you can't be serious.
well I guess that does it then. libtards unite.
lol

As being about bipartisanship.

:paranoid:

you don't see it either?
shocking.
how are the rrsp's?


I'm sure it's everyone but you, just like every other time.

Ok

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 11:17 am
by vf
Apparently Mitch McConnell(Majority Leader and far enough on the right to obstruct Obama's SCOTUS appointment) and John McCain are now libtards; among other Republicans who voted for or co-sponsored it.

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 11:26 am
by akiberg
vf wrote:Apparently Mitch McConnell(Majority Leader and far enough on the right to obstruct Obama's SCOTUS appointment) and John McCain are now libtards; among other Republicans who voted for or co-sponsored it.

you posted a link to a resolution that was created by a screeching harpy in order to placate to a bunch of screeching harpies (libtards). it essentially says the 'sky is fucking blue'. not done there you prattled on about this bipartisan agreement where everyone essentially agrees the sky is fucking blue. not done there, you then made the conclusion that it was 'weird' there was no mention of antifa in the screeching harpies resolution. yeah, big lol.
the resolution also never mentioned shaq being tall or kate having nice tits. I guess those things aren't true, too?
weird....

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 5:41 pm
by vf
akiberg wrote:you posted a link to a resolution that was created by a screeching harpy in order to placate to a bunch of screeching harpies (libtards).


Join Resolution 49 was sponsored by a Republican into the house. US politics doesn't do things to placate the other side when they have a majority, when does any country ever do that?. A Republican didn't have to introduce this bill, 9 other Republicans didn't have to co-sponsor it and House Republicans didn't have to vote for it. For a guy who knows nothing about US politics you sure do nothing about US politics.

akiberg wrote:it essentially says the 'sky is fucking blue'.


And yet here you are arguing about it.

akiberg wrote:not done there you prattled on about this bipartisan agreement where everyone essentially agrees the sky is fucking blue.


prat·tle
ˈpradl/
verb
verb: prattle; 3rd person present: prattles; past tense: prattled; past participle: prattled; gerund or present participle: prattling

1.
talk at length in a foolish or inconsequential way.
"she began to prattle on about her visit to the dentist"

noun
noun: prattle

1.
foolish or inconsequential talk.
"do you intend to keep up this childish prattle?"

akiberg wrote:not done there, you then made the conclusion that it was 'weird' there was no mention of antifa in the screeching harpies resolution. yeah, big lol.


Given how horrible the antifa are one would assume they would also be condemned in such a document. This of course presumes one has a firm grip on reality.

akiberg wrote:the resolution also never mentioned shaq being tall or kate having nice tits. I guess those things aren't true, too?
weird....
[/quote]


Image

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 7:19 pm
by akiberg
I actually kind of hope you spent a lot of time on that.
good for you. me now learned.
lol

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2017 5:06 am
by Curry Rage
If only you had the capacity.

[Canned response in T-minus....]

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2017 5:26 am
by Curry Rage
There's a change a-comin':




Next up: petrol.

https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-uk ... an-new-gas

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2017 9:30 am
by akiberg
Curry Rage wrote:There's a change a-comin':




Next up: petrol.

https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-uk ... an-new-gas

next thing you know they'll invent electronic noise machines that sound like a tiny little man banging sticks.
what a minute.....

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2017 9:36 am
by Curry Rage
And we have liftoff!


Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2017 9:48 am
by Curry Rage
akiberg wrote:next thing you know they'll invent electronic noise machines that sound like a tiny little man banging sticks.
what a minute.....


The ones that have reduced the number of musicians who can make a living drastically and forced those that do to sound more like them and make less money? Great analogy.

:donger:

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2017 10:09 am
by akiberg
Curry Rage wrote:
akiberg wrote:next thing you know they'll invent electronic noise machines that sound like a tiny little man banging sticks.
what a minute.....


The ones that have reduced the number of musicians who can make a living drastically and forced those that do to sound more like them and make less money? Great analogy.

:donger:

I was just adding to your now weekly re-tweets that perfectly align with your banging bombastic view of how the world might change. I didn't realize it was already technologically possible to replicate stick banging. what a crazy world we live in.

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2017 11:46 am
by Curry Rage
Aki snacks.


Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2017 1:31 pm
by akiberg
not a wtf meme or a cute little drummer boy video but reading might still suit the few.

https://www.google.ca/amp/nationalpost. ... action/amp

it's just like Harper said, he wasn't ready.

small business owners now added to an ever growing dissatisfied electorate.

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2017 5:36 pm
by vf
akiberg wrote:I actually kind of hope you spent a lot of time on that.
good for you. me now learned.
lol


40 seconds maybe? Not sure what would of taken so much time as it was all available in the original link I posted. Had you bothered to spend a few seconds reading it instead of exposing your ever rampant partisanship you could have saved somebody else learning you and learned something yourself.
lol

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2017 6:15 pm
by akiberg
vf wrote:
akiberg wrote:I actually kind of hope you spent a lot of time on that.
good for you. me now learned.
lol


40 seconds maybe? Not sure what would of taken so much time as it was all available in the original link I posted. Had you bothered to spend a few seconds reading it instead of exposing your ever rampant partisanship you could have saved somebody else learning you and learned something yourself.
lol

the sky is blue.
I'm glad we all agree.
since you are so well versed in what a straw man argument is maybe you should take another look at the conclusion you made in your original sharing is caring post. that conclusion and you calling the sky is blue resolution 'bipartisan' was quite funny. still is.

I read it, still not so sure you have.

Re: anarchy 1.0 - Kriegsanstifter

Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2017 10:15 pm
by MP
Big black balls of bitumen...