Dem Lines 2014-2015

Straight noggin
User avatar
chewey
Registered Broad
Posts: 1428
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:21 pm
Location: Near You!

Dem Lines 2014-2015

Post #1 by chewey » Sun Sep 07, 2014 12:16 am

So heading into next year, what are your guys's prediction for the lines? Mine are:

RoR - Duch - Iggy
Lando - MacK - Tangs
McGinn - Mitchell - Briere
McLeod - Winchester - Talbot

E: Bordeleau, Cliche

Honestly the bottom 6 might be moved around a little but overall it "should" be deep enough not to crap the bed too often.

Stuart - EJ
Hedja - Barrie
Redmond - Holden

E: Guenin, Elliott, Stollery

I am not sure what to think about our defense. Is it better than last year? Maybe. Will it still be this teams biggest weakness? Most likely. Varly will pretty much need to perform like he did last year.

Varly
Berra

So the offense is I would say taken a side step. We certainly lost some utility with Stastny but adding Iggy + more depth should hopefully replace some of the offense and defense Stastny brought.

Defense, again side step. Not a big enough improvement to suggested we have a solid top 4, but with the emergence of Barrie middle to end of last season and adding Stuart it is a little more stable than what we started with last year.

Berra is also a pretty big question mark in goal so here is hoping this expensive experiment works.
User avatar
NHL33
Posts: 3081
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:11 pm
Received rep: 1 time

Post #2 by NHL33 » Sun Sep 07, 2014 12:48 am

The defense may be bad but it's still better than last season's.

I think your lines are probably right. Having some second thoughts on how effective Iginla will be...w/e.
User avatar
chewey
Registered Broad
Posts: 1428
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:21 pm
Location: Near You!

Post #3 by chewey » Sun Sep 07, 2014 1:20 am

dempsey_k wrote:word out of Vail training is that MacKinnon has grown from a boy into a manbeast over the summer.


Is that good or bad? Normally when they bulk up you always have concerns about the speeds. I don't think Duchene really slowed down after he bulked up but that is mostly due to majority of his mass being in his lower body (no homo).
User avatar
NHL33
Posts: 3081
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:11 pm
Received rep: 1 time

Post #4 by NHL33 » Sun Sep 07, 2014 2:43 am

Yeah, MacKinnon is going to be a monster. I still can't believe how good he was in his rookie season. Fucking nuts.
User avatar
ABasin
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 12:59 am

Post #5 by ABasin » Sun Sep 07, 2014 9:42 am

chewey wrote:So heading into next year, what are your guys's prediction for the lines? Mine are:

RoR - Duch - Iggy
Lando - MacK - Tangs
McGinn - Mitchell - Briere
McLeod - Winchester - Talbot

E: Bordeleau, Cliche

Honestly the bottom 6 might be moved around a little but overall it "should" be deep enough not to crap the bed too often.

Stuart - EJ
Hedja - Barrie
Redmond - Holden

E: Guenin, Elliott, Stollery

I am not sure what to think about our defense. Is it better than last year? Maybe. Will it still be this teams biggest weakness? Most likely. Varly will pretty much need to perform like he did last year.

Varly
Berra

So the offense is I would say taken a side step. We certainly lost some utility with Stastny but adding Iggy + more depth should hopefully replace some of the offense and defense Stastny brought.

Defense, again side step. Not a big enough improvement to suggested we have a solid top 4, but with the emergence of Barrie middle to end of last season and adding Stuart it is a little more stable than what we started with last year.

Berra is also a pretty big question mark in goal so here is hoping this expensive experiment works.


Not sure of the exact alignment, but I think it's a good idea to put Iginla on one line and Landeskog on the other. I've always been a fan of at least one big physical player on each line. Just not sure whether Iginla would be better with MacKinnon and Tanguay. In the end, I'd probably switch Iginla and Landeskog here.

Third line should be pretty good, and again with some physicality in there with McGinn. On the 4th line: are we all sure McLeod isn't going to get beat out by Bordeleau?

On defense, we'll have to see. I think you have the right side nailed down exactly - EJ, Barrie, Redmond (though since I've never seen that last guy play, that may be a bit premature). Maybe Elliott can beat him out. Doubt it though.

It's the left side that is a bit grey, IMO. No doubt it'll be Stuart, Hejda, Holden. But in what order? I never really understood Roy's man-love for Holden last season, but there's no doubt it's there in full force. Is it possible he'd play 1st or 2nd pairing minutes? Hope not, but you never know.

Finally, I do not believe Stuart is going to be anywhere near as bad as many Avs fans believe.
User avatar
ABasin
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 12:59 am

Post #6 by ABasin » Sun Sep 07, 2014 9:45 am

dempsey_k wrote:word out of Vail training is that MacKinnon has grown from a boy into a manbeast over the summer.


I also wonder whether or not they're going to put MacKinnon at center this season, or let O'R play there. Probably the former, but we'll see. Part of MacKinnon's success last season, was his incredible explosiveness out in front of the pack - he did that all of the time because he was at wing, not behind his own net playing defense, which is often required at the center position.
User avatar
NHL33
Posts: 3081
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:11 pm
Received rep: 1 time

Post #7 by NHL33 » Sun Sep 07, 2014 2:03 pm

MacKinnon may not be Selke caliber, but he is not a defensive liability. It's still prudent to limit his defensive responsibilities, but I think there's little chance he's not centering; his skill set is too good. His explosiveness was best accentuated when on Duchene's line, which had less to do with being on the wing than simply having another skater able to keep up and harass the opposition with speed.
User avatar
Brain of J
Registered Broad
Posts: 3499
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:36 pm

Post #8 by Brain of J » Mon Sep 08, 2014 2:04 am

MacKinnon was drafted to be a center, and Roy has said he likes him there. I'd be pretty surprised if he isn't playing center most of the season, if not all of it. You deal with the inevitable growing pains. I liked MacKinnon at center last year. When he goes down low and the wingers hit him with speed and he can get moving, much like Duchene, then it just backs off the other team.
User avatar
ABasin
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 12:59 am

Post #9 by ABasin » Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:03 pm

hek wrote:Yep. If you're going to let Stastny go then it's time for MacKinnon to step up and start learning the center position. He's got the talent so might as well throw him to the wolves and make him learn defense and draws. No point in sheltering him anymore.

Lines:

O'Reilly - Duchene - Tanguay
Landeskog - MacKinnon - Iginla
McGinn - Mitchell - Briere
McLeod - Winchester - Talbot

Ex. Bordeleau, Cliche, Hishon

Stuart - EJ
Hejda - Barrie
Holden - Redmond

Ex. Wilson, Guenin, Noreau

Varly
Berra

I'd throw Iginla with MacKinnon to start to give him a little bit more of a physical, veteran presence than Tanguay. There isn't a center on the team I'd trust to throw out against the other team's top lines consistently through a game. Time for Duchene to step up his defensive game big time. Hopefully, Redmond is a diamond in the rough type of guy that can solidify the bottom pairing, it got old holding my breath every time Holden and Guenin/Wilson were out there.


Two questions:

- Are you concerned that this first line would get pushed around a lot?
- Do you believe that Elliott is toast with the organization, and that the Avs will lose him for nothing in waivers?
User avatar
ABasin
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 12:59 am

Post #10 by ABasin » Tue Sep 09, 2014 12:18 pm

hek wrote:Good questions, AB.

First off, while a first line of O'Reilly - Duchene - Tanguay is not physically imposing in any way I don't think they play small. I don't ever remember O'Reilly or Duchene ever being manhandled by bigger defensemen. Duchene with his skating and lower body strength and O'Reilly with his hockey sense seem to have the ability to play against a wide range of defenders. They're not big, but they can flat out play and I don't seem to remember either guy ever struggling in the corners or in front of the net. Tanguay has always been a finesse guy and with his age and injury history he certainly could be a detriment to the line in that respect. It may be trouble in the long run, but I don't think it will be because of O'Reilly or Duchene. Those two together has a ton of success last year.

To be completely honest I totally forgot about Elliott. I've never thought much of him and I still don't. He's a weak defender that has good offensive tools in the AHL and is inconsistent in the NHL. I won't shed a tear if he beats out guys like Guenin or Wilson, but he's going to have to show he's put it all together. We shall see through the preseason. With how weak the depth defenders are for the Avs I wouldn't be surprised if he sticks, but even so I think that's damning him with faint praise.


Yeah, he's got to show something in camp. He's got good skating and stick skills, but something has been missing.

It's going to be an interesting offseason in 2015, as the Avs have 5 UFA contracts coming due (totaling $13.25M), and I can't see the Avs re-upping a single one of those contracts. Three of them on defense, too. Seems that perhaps Elliott is available to other teams on waivers, one year too soon.
User avatar
Brain of J
Registered Broad
Posts: 3499
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:36 pm

Post #11 by Brain of J » Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:21 am

I don't think Elliott would get picked up on waivers. He'll stick until the end of camp, and get sent down when the mass of players are sent down by every team. By that time, all NHL teams have already picked their teams, not leaving much room for a waiver pickup. We'll see if it gets to that point, though. I'd love for him to win a spot over Guenin and Noreau.
User avatar
ABasin
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 12:59 am

Post #12 by ABasin » Wed Sep 10, 2014 10:25 am

Brain of J wrote:I don't think Elliott would get picked up on waivers. He'll stick until the end of camp, and get sent down when the mass of players are sent down by every team. By that time, all NHL teams have already picked their teams, not leaving much room for a waiver pickup. We'll see if it gets to that point, though. I'd love for him to win a spot over Guenin and Noreau.


I'm not quite so confident. I suspect there's got to be a team out there in desperate need of prospects at the D position, and they'll snap up Elliott pretty quickly, I'd think. Kind of like if some other team allowed a decent wing prospect to be subject to waivers - I think the Avs would be quite interested, since the best non-NHL prospect they have at the position in the organization is goddamn Sgarbossa (who sucks, IMO).

Unless of course I don't completely understand this waiver/claim a player thing - which is most certainly possible. So, if Elliott gets claimed by another team, can they simply send him down to their AHL team, or do they have to play him in the NHL? And if that team does send him down to the AHL, does he go back on waivers or something?
User avatar
VLoo
Posts: 9238
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:33 am
Has given rep: 52 times
Received rep: 72 times

Post #13 by VLoo » Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:40 pm

I think he has to go to the NHL roster, and then if he's sent down before a certain period of time the Avs would get first crack at reclaiming him, where they would be allowed to place him in the AHL. I think. I might be confusing that with the NFL rules for practice squad players though.
PredsFan77 wrote:Vloo: I forgot to include him in my top ten, but I would encourage him to sleep with any of my exes so that we could say our penises have been in the same space. I'd like that.
User avatar
WarriorOfGandhi
Registered Broad
Posts: 1309
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 1:47 am
Location: Ann Arbor, MI

Post #14 by WarriorOfGandhi » Wed Sep 10, 2014 6:45 pm

how many teams have their own Elliott? I don't know enough about prospects but I'd think at least half already have a small not-meeting-expectations offensive dman.
User avatar
ABasin
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 12:59 am

Post #15 by ABasin » Wed Sep 10, 2014 9:17 pm

WarriorOfGandhi wrote:how many teams have their own Elliott? I don't know enough about prospects but I'd think at least half already have a small not-meeting-expectations offensive dman.


I acknowledge the obvious lying about players' heights/weights that occurs amongst NHL prospects, but is 6'1"/190 really 'small'?
User avatar
Brain of J
Registered Broad
Posts: 3499
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:36 pm

Post #16 by Brain of J » Thu Sep 11, 2014 12:42 am

ABasin wrote:I'm not quite so confident. I suspect there's got to be a team out there in desperate need of prospects at the D position, and they'll snap up Elliott pretty quickly, I'd think. Kind of like if some other team allowed a decent wing prospect to be subject to waivers - I think the Avs would be quite interested, since the best non-NHL prospect they have at the position in the organization is goddamn Sgarbossa (who sucks, IMO).

Unless of course I don't completely understand this waiver/claim a player thing - which is most certainly possible. So, if Elliott gets claimed by another team, can they simply send him down to their AHL team, or do they have to play him in the NHL? And if that team does send him down to the AHL, does he go back on waivers or something?

Any team that claims Elliott has to keep him in the NHL, and if they decide to waive him, the Avs get the first shot at him, and can put him in the AHL.

Like WOG said, there are a lot of teams out there with there own versions of Stefan Elliott. There's a lot of teams already out there with full 23 man rosters themselves. I don't think the odds of him getting picked up are that great, to be honest.

I'm ready for the season to start. It will be kind of surreal to see Iginla in an Avs jersey.
User avatar
ABasin
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 12:59 am

Post #17 by ABasin » Thu Sep 11, 2014 9:34 am

Brain of J wrote:Any team that claims Elliott has to keep him in the NHL, and if they decide to waive him, the Avs get the first shot at him, and can put him in the AHL.

Like WOG said, there are a lot of teams out there with there own versions of Stefan Elliott. There's a lot of teams already out there with full 23 man rosters themselves. I don't think the odds of him getting picked up are that great, to be honest.

I'm ready for the season to start. It will be kind of surreal to see Iginla in an Avs jersey.


OK, I'm learning something here.

So, if the Avs lose Elliott to waivers, the team that picks him up has to keep him in the NHL - for the entire season? In other words, if they drop him back to their AHL affiliate at any point in the season, Elliott goes back on waivers, and the Avs have the first shot at him? Interesting. And that does change my perspective a bit, though I'm still worried that someone would pick him up.

I was about to take a look at all of the teams, and try and figure out which teams would potentially need a guy like Elliott. In other words, which NHL roster desperately needs good young defensemen on it. Didn't have to look too far……
User avatar
VLoo
Posts: 9238
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:33 am
Has given rep: 52 times
Received rep: 72 times

Post #18 by VLoo » Thu Sep 11, 2014 10:01 am

If he can't crack this defense corps, then I think we're playing pretty fast and loose with the term "good"
PredsFan77 wrote:Vloo: I forgot to include him in my top ten, but I would encourage him to sleep with any of my exes so that we could say our penises have been in the same space. I'd like that.
User avatar
WarriorOfGandhi
Registered Broad
Posts: 1309
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 1:47 am
Location: Ann Arbor, MI

Post #19 by WarriorOfGandhi » Thu Sep 11, 2014 12:10 pm

ABasin wrote:I acknowledge the obvious lying about players' heights/weights that occurs amongst NHL prospects, but is 6'1"/190 really 'small'?


wow, is he really 6'1? My memory is him looking like he was 5'10 out there.
User avatar
Brain of J
Registered Broad
Posts: 3499
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:36 pm

Post #20 by Brain of J » Thu Sep 11, 2014 7:12 pm

Elliott is definitely taller than a guy like Barrie, but he's so skinny it doesn't even matter.
User avatar
NHL33
Posts: 3081
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:11 pm
Received rep: 1 time

Post #21 by NHL33 » Fri Sep 12, 2014 1:03 am

Do any of you watch LEM? Did any of you catch a non-trivial amount of games where Elliott played?
User avatar
NHL33
Posts: 3081
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:11 pm
Received rep: 1 time

Post #22 by NHL33 » Fri Sep 12, 2014 8:41 pm

hek wrote:Not at all. Who watches the AHL?

My opinions are based off a very limited NHL sample size. Right or wrong.

Then it'll just become a glorified circle jerk.

He looked dumb. I have no idea how he's doing now.
User avatar
ABasin
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 12:59 am

Post #23 by ABasin » Sat Sep 13, 2014 11:33 am

NHL33 wrote:Do any of you watch LEM? Did any of you catch a non-trivial amount of games where Elliott played?


No, I don't. Though I would from time to time if it was readily available.

I go to every training camp every year (though this year I'm camping instead), and catch a couple of home preseason games also. Those plus Elliott's few actual NHL games are where I draw any conclusions, lame though that may be. And in those few games, dude was pillow soft.

Return to “2001 Stanley Cup Champion Colorado Avalanche”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest