Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

..et d'autres discussions ennuyeuses
User avatar
Captain Roy Bringus
Registered Broad
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:30 pm
Received rep: 1 time

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #501 by Captain Roy Bringus » Sat Jan 09, 2016 3:00 pm

I had no idea Milo Yiannopoulos was a Sens fan.
User avatar
Retardé S
Registered Broad
Posts: 18516
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 2:18 pm
Has given rep: 1044 times
Received rep: 1242 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #502 by Retardé S » Sun Jan 10, 2016 9:18 pm

lol Society is so soft these days. This is why I'm a big advocate of having kids walk at least 5 miles to get to school. None of this transportation bullshit. The motor industry is at fault for such uptight butthole mentality.
User avatar
RTWAP
Posts: 2888
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:01 am
Location: O-town
Has given rep: 28 times
Received rep: 34 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #503 by RTWAP » Sun Jan 31, 2016 10:45 am

Just had a thought about Gamergate.

It pisses me off that there are trolls out there who get their kicks making the internet an uncomfortable place for women. What I'd love to see is a browser plug-in called Sunlight that stops trolls in their tacks by hiding any comment, tweet, post, email from a known troll. The user would have a per-platform choice (e.g. youtube, twitter, email, etc.) to completely hide the content, or just replace it with a line saying 'Possible troll content - click here to unhide - click here to see content leading to troll designation'.

There would be a global list of reported trolls, and per-user lists of trolls. If a social media account is designated as a troll by a certain threshold (10? 20?) of individual users then it would be published as a known troll. There would be a review mechanism. The list of offending posts would be listed and available on a central service.

Reporting:

When reporting troll content the following steps would be taken:
1) Add the reported troll to the reporting user's personal list of trolls. There would be user settings (per platform) for whether to designate them as personal trolls this would be (1) Always (default) (2) Ask each time (3) Never.
2) Add the reported troll to the global list of possible trolls subject to validation. There would be user settings (per platform) for whether to report the content as trolling for possible global troll designation would be (1) Always (2) Ask each time (3) Never.
Note: Google is not a platform. It would be more granular than that. Google+ would be a platform, gmail would be a platform, youtube would be a platform.
Note: When content is private it may be advisable to inform the reporting user that the content they are reporting may be visible to everyone if a troll designation is made. But also to remind the user that the troll already has the content. Consider whether sharing it more widely makes you feel safer about the situation.
3) Gather validation data (certificate root for https: accessible platform, cert validation results, and browser reliability (page source/plug-ins/user scripting/tracert))
4) Report the platform, reported user ID (not username if possible), content, link to content, validation data, and reporting user to the central service
5) Validate by central service
- if publicly accessible web link then confirm content is currently as reported and note timestamp
-- Note: Images embedded in content can be changed after first load, or different images can be served up depending on IP. Go with whatever the reporting user's browser retrieved.
- if private and platform supports https: then confirm cert root and chain, and run browser reliability check
- if private and platform does not support https: (e.g. message board PM) then run browser reliability check

Central Service:


1) Would receive, validate, and maintain reports of trolling behaviour
2) Would monitor reported user accounts to determine when thresholds have been reached
3) Would publish list of designated trolls to the web and provide copies of reported troll content for each
4) Would host a list of designated troll accounts for internet access by Sunshine browser plug-ins to use
5) Would host the review process (see below)

Review:

Gathering a certain threshold of objections to the the troll designation (again on the central service) would result in a public vote (all objectors, and original troll reporters would be notified). At the end of the vote the results would be submitted to a volunteer board along with the original "troll" comments.

There are 4 possible results of this review. (1) Malicious trolling, which upholds the troll status and marks objectors as possessors of poor judgment (their contributions to the listing, objections, and review processes would be ignored henceforth). (2) Trolling, which upholds the troll status. (3) Allowable comment, which removes the troll status. (4) Abusive Complaint, which removes the troll status and marks the original complainants and anyone who agreed with them as possessors of poor judgment (their contributions to the listing, objections, and review processes would be ignored henceforth).

In addition to the above, when first launching all users passing the troll designation threshold would undergo a quick review of some or all of their reported posts to confirm the reports were not malicious.
User avatar
RTWAP
Posts: 2888
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:01 am
Location: O-town
Has given rep: 28 times
Received rep: 34 times

Re:

Post #504 by RTWAP » Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:21 am



Just re-read that again.

It's not a very important point, but I don't think Rodger's driving malevolence was misogyny. The thing he hated more than anything was the social dynamics of dating. Anyone who might understand it and be good at it was a target. It's speculation, but I bet he wouldn't have had a problem with a female quadriplegic. He wouldn't hate her because she was a woman. I can picture him not even conceiving of her as someone who would date. And even if he did, she probably wouldn't be desirable to him, and something that dating "rules" were preventing him from fucking.

It just seems like early on Rodgers probably had self-esteem issues and he responded by presenting a tough confident face to the world (or parts of it). And then his armour became the anchor that weighed him down. He couldn't accept that he needed to fit the social rules of dating, that he needed to face rejection, work on his social skills, etc. He just festered with the objects of his desire all around him and permanently out of reach due to his own choices about how to perceive himself and his "rightful" place in the world. It's fundamentally pathetic.

And he's probably not that unique in his anger toward society, some aspects of social dynamics, and the population groups that best reflect those dynamics. I actually have some sympathy for the young boy who felt bad about himself. But he chose the darkest path for getting out of it. He prioritized protecting his self-image over all else. It's kind of an auto-immune disorder of the brain, rejecting all input that might help him deserve his goal and instead just pretending he deserved it and others were taking it away.

But it's more of a technical argument about misogyny than an important distinction. He was relatively indiscriminately dangerous to many women. If someone wants to call that misogyny then OK. He certainly had a very broken view of the female-male dynamic when it came to dating.
User avatar
Craig
Registered Broad
Posts: 18485
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:33 pm
Location: Toronto
Has given rep: 32 times
Received rep: 446 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #505 by Craig » Sun Jan 31, 2016 1:10 pm

A global registry of undesirables? What could go wrong?
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 7109
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 134 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #506 by jester » Sun Jan 31, 2016 1:21 pm

Craig wrote:A global registry of undesirables? What could go wrong?


Eh, it's of note that this is a plug-in ... so, it would only come into effect for people that desire to have their web content censored. I agree, however, that it might be prone to potential abuses, or censorship overreach. A potentially "softer" option would be a plug-in that allowed you to create a filter for yourself, which most message board software has already.
User avatar
Sturminator
Registered Broad
Posts: 983
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:55 am
Received rep: 9 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #507 by Sturminator » Sun Jan 31, 2016 2:56 pm

Hell hath no fury like a delusional weasel scorned.
User avatar
RTWAP
Posts: 2888
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:01 am
Location: O-town
Has given rep: 28 times
Received rep: 34 times

Re: Re:

Post #508 by RTWAP » Mon Feb 01, 2016 6:58 pm

dempsey_k wrote:
RTWAP wrote:He was relatively indiscriminately dangerous to many women. If someone wants to call that misogyny then OK.


There's really nothing to say if you're capable of finding some nuance where that's not misogyny.

I'm glad we agree it's a nuance. And not a particularly important one.

Maybe we should ask Big#D to do an awesome Venn diagram of people Rodgers hated, women, and men.
User avatar
Germz
Registered Broad
Posts: 4845
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 3:48 pm
Location: USA
Has given rep: 118 times
Received rep: 108 times

Re: Re:

Post #509 by Germz » Mon Feb 01, 2016 7:20 pm

RTWAP wrote:


But it's more of a technical argument about misogyny than an important distinction. He was relatively indiscriminately dangerous to many women. If someone wants to call that misogyny then OK.


It is.

Similarly, if a man from some kind of fundamentalist sect hates all women that don't 'know their place', then he's a misogynist, even if he loves his dutiful and obedient wife and daughter. If a white slave owner was kind to his own slaves but favoured their perpetual subjection because they were black, then he's a racist. If a conservative voter was ok with John Baird because he kept his sexuality 'private', but hated all gays who showed affection in public spaces because it was disgusting and unnatural, then he's a homophobe.

If you could only call someone a misogynist who absolutely hated all women on the planet without distinction, then we would have damn few misogynists in this world. And the truth is we have a lot.
User avatar
TGR
Registered Broad
Posts: 1978
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 1:25 pm
Has given rep: 17 times
Received rep: 29 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #510 by TGR » Wed Feb 03, 2016 11:34 pm

Regardless if you agree or disagree with this RooshV, why ban him from coming to Canadian cities?

Ottawa mayor Jim Watson is strongly against any of his meet-ups, but really.. who gives a flying fuck? 40-50 men in a hotel conference room is a big deal apparently...

User avatar
TGR
Registered Broad
Posts: 1978
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 1:25 pm
Has given rep: 17 times
Received rep: 29 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #511 by TGR » Wed Feb 03, 2016 11:55 pm



I mean.. look at this guy.
User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 9488
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 171 times
Received rep: 518 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #512 by Dr_Chimera » Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:04 am

"pro-rape views"?

_dong?
User avatar
RTWAP
Posts: 2888
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:01 am
Location: O-town
Has given rep: 28 times
Received rep: 34 times

Re: Re:

Post #513 by RTWAP » Fri Feb 05, 2016 8:28 pm

Germz wrote:
RTWAP wrote:


But it's more of a technical argument about misogyny than an important distinction. He was relatively indiscriminately dangerous to many women. If someone wants to call that misogyny then OK.


It is.

Similarly, if a man from some kind of fundamentalist sect hates all women that don't 'know their place', then he's a misogynist, even if he loves his dutiful and obedient wife and daughter. If a white slave owner was kind to his own slaves but favoured their perpetual subjection because they were black, then he's a racist. If a conservative voter was ok with John Baird because he kept his sexuality 'private', but hated all gays who showed affection in public spaces because it was disgusting and unnatural, then he's a homophobe.

If you could only call someone a misogynist who absolutely hated all women on the planet without distinction, then we would have damn few misogynists in this world. And the truth is we have a lot.


In your examples the targeted groups are "all blacks", "all women behaving normally" and "all gays behaving normally". The counter example is of someone who hated a specific subset of the female and male populations who both participated successfully in dating. Does his expectations of attractive women display a profound lack of appreciation for and understanding of them as anything other than the focus of his desire? Yes. But if it had been a lesbian with exactly the same views and actions would anyone call her a misogynist? No. But that's so exceedingly unlikely to happen that it's only useful as a thought exercise.

But I don't really care to argue the point. The twerp hated some women because they didn't act the way he wanted them to. Aside from the selectivity of his hatred, and its gender balance, it's the same pattern as most other misogyny, where women face unfortunate obstacles and unwarranted consequences for acting on their own desires and in their own interests.
User avatar
RTWAP
Posts: 2888
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:01 am
Location: O-town
Has given rep: 28 times
Received rep: 34 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #514 by RTWAP » Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:00 pm

jester wrote:
Craig wrote:A global registry of undesirables? What could go wrong?


Eh, it's of note that this is a plug-in ... so, it would only come into effect for people that desire to have their web content censored. I agree, however, that it might be prone to potential abuses, or censorship overreach. A potentially "softer" option would be a plug-in that allowed you to create a filter for yourself, which most message board software has already.


At its heart that is what I proposed, but then added a feature to allow someone to choose to crowdsource other's personal choices to ignore prospective trolls before they are ever noticed.
User avatar
Slick Nick
Registered Broad
Posts: 7328
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:40 pm
Has given rep: 1085 times
Received rep: 679 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #515 by Slick Nick » Mon Apr 18, 2016 5:49 pm

User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 9488
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 171 times
Received rep: 518 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #516 by Dr_Chimera » Mon Apr 18, 2016 10:44 pm

Don't know what's dumber, the kids or the self-satisfied douchebag interviewer. What is his point anyway? That Stanley Fish warped their minds?
User avatar
Sturminator
Registered Broad
Posts: 983
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:55 am
Received rep: 9 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #517 by Sturminator » Tue Apr 19, 2016 8:55 am

This is surely not what the family policy institute is driving at with that bit of silliness, but the concept of personal identity fully decoupled from the actual physical constraints of our existence is potentially pretty dangerous, as it puts a seductive modern twist on the old "soul myth". Teaching people that they can transcend their physical conditions simply by wishing for it to be so is a vital step towards a culture of docile, obedient workers who prefer escapism to rattling against the bars of their cages. See Marcuse, Herbert.
User avatar
TGR
Registered Broad
Posts: 1978
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 1:25 pm
Has given rep: 17 times
Received rep: 29 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #518 by TGR » Fri Apr 22, 2016 10:44 pm

How great is America? The debate shifts from same-sex marriage to toilet laws.
User avatar
Retardé S
Registered Broad
Posts: 18516
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 2:18 pm
Has given rep: 1044 times
Received rep: 1242 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #519 by Retardé S » Thu May 12, 2016 9:20 am

Nope.
User avatar
Retardé S
Registered Broad
Posts: 18516
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 2:18 pm
Has given rep: 1044 times
Received rep: 1242 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #520 by Retardé S » Thu May 12, 2016 9:27 am

Chaos Reigns wrote:
Slick Nick wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfO1veFs6Ho


They didn't interview a single transgender student. They used dumb cis students to prove they were being indoctrinated by evil blue-haired Mengeles teaching abominable gender theory that's against Christ. Stuff like this is used to support bathroom laws like in North Carolina. The filmmakers and the people who paid for this should all be given swirleys in a toilet festering with diarrhea in the bathroom that biology determines they should use in their state of course.


The point of the video was showing just how empty someone's opinions can be on social matters such as the bathroom laws. At least, that's what I get out of videos like this. Not the by-partisanship you're describing.
User avatar
Whit Dickman
Registered Broad
Posts: 3474
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 10:56 pm
Has given rep: 78 times
Received rep: 196 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #521 by Whit Dickman » Thu May 12, 2016 10:17 am

Chaos Reigns wrote:She's smarter than 99% of the dialog on this topic.



"self-care should always be #1" "We need to question who is free to speak"

She may be smarter than 99% of the dialog on the topic, but that says far more about the dialog than it does her.

She says that trigger warnings are used so that we can discuss things more openly. Uh... what?

Here's my question: If those who advocate for trigger warning care so much for the trauma of damaged individuals, who haven't they bothered reading any of the actual research on the topic? A trigger warning increases the likelihood of a negative emotional event. It's a straightforward mechanism: The 'warning' is interpreted as 'this is something that you should be offended by'. Trigger warnings are only appealing to SJWs because they make someone who they disagree with say something that they probably don't want to say. It's playground politics.
User avatar
Retardé S
Registered Broad
Posts: 18516
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 2:18 pm
Has given rep: 1044 times
Received rep: 1242 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #522 by Retardé S » Thu May 12, 2016 10:46 am

I'd say the trigger warnings phenomena is used by people that can't stand their victimhood being challenged. Ironically trigger warnings actually prevent open dialogue, analysis and scrutiny, not the other way around.

This girl is just sounds like a closet SJW.
User avatar
Whit Dickman
Registered Broad
Posts: 3474
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 10:56 pm
Has given rep: 78 times
Received rep: 196 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #523 by Whit Dickman » Thu May 12, 2016 11:45 am

Chaos Reigns wrote:
Whit Dickman wrote:She says that trigger warnings are used so that we can discuss things more openly. Uh... what?


Ok so imagine Bucky Barnes is sitting in your class, and he is triggered by that word combination that turns him into a killing machine. The discussion isn't so much fun anymore after he's smashed several students' faces on their desks and impaled the professor on a pen holder. That's a fictional exaggeration of what it feels like for some victims of violence to be forced to relive those things unexpectedly. If given proper warning, then they can do exactly what all the knuckledraggers demand of them: to buck up and get over it. At least usually. If they don't think they can, they have control over the situation to avert it - something they didn't have when they were victimized. Everyone's better off, and the discussion is indeed more open to actual victims who aren't flippant about it.

Now the fact that this is culture of victimhood abused and politicized by vapid tumblr idiots whose greatest victimization was someone spelling their difficult name wrong at Starbucks is another story. I'm much more with you on that.


But the trigger warning is one of the word combinations, dk. And there was no warning prior to the trigger warning, so it comes unexpectedly. The logic only makes sense in special cases where something particularly 'triggering' (perhaps a rape scene or something) is presented completely unexpectedly and the person isn't able to leave immediately. This is not a very common thing, and I can't imagine many college profs (or w/e) are doing stuff like this.

Trigger warnings do not give people any more or less control. Control is determined by the right to leave the room.
User avatar
Whit Dickman
Registered Broad
Posts: 3474
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 10:56 pm
Has given rep: 78 times
Received rep: 196 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #524 by Whit Dickman » Thu May 12, 2016 11:47 am

And that, of course, is focusing solely on victims of violence. Victims of, say, racism cannot be trigger warning-ed into safety. Race is everywhere. Sexism is everywhere. Adding trigger warnings only increases the amount of triggers.
User avatar
Germz
Registered Broad
Posts: 4845
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 3:48 pm
Location: USA
Has given rep: 118 times
Received rep: 108 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #525 by Germz » Thu May 12, 2016 11:47 am

Trigger warnings may be nonsense much of the time but I think they are historically useful nonsense. So many young progressives seem obsessed with the idea of empathy as a social good. Hence the election of a Canadian PM with 'emotional intelligence'. And I do think that empathy is a social good. Yes, they are probably too obsessed. Yes, some of them are more interested in narcissism and self-aggrandizement under the guise of empathy. Young people do and say stupid things when they get ideologically invested in something they deem to be meaningful. 60s radicals did and said the stupidest things. The stupidest. And contemporary progressives have chosen to make empathy meaningful.

You can be on the right side of history and still be an idiot. That's youth culture at its best. The idiot part is pretty inevitable; the right side of history part is not.
User avatar
Germz
Registered Broad
Posts: 4845
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 3:48 pm
Location: USA
Has given rep: 118 times
Received rep: 108 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #526 by Germz » Thu May 12, 2016 2:24 pm

Chaos Reigns wrote:
Whit Dickman wrote:But the trigger warning is one of the word combinations, dk.


Kiiiind of true, but to some extent that's the unpredictability of college climates that wish to remain harmful or not. Reasonable expectation. If I were a prof teaching Ovid I'd feel uncomfortable diving right in without a big ol TW, but if student orgs moved to ban it from campus or get me fired for teaching it, I'd fight that. I guess that's where I'd draw the line.


Yeah, banning Ovid would be straight up totalitarian lunacy. But the poem is awful rapey.
User avatar
Germz
Registered Broad
Posts: 4845
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 3:48 pm
Location: USA
Has given rep: 118 times
Received rep: 108 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #527 by Germz » Thu May 12, 2016 2:43 pm

Chaos Reigns wrote:
Then you read Ovid and oh yah its about rape. Soon you have to ask what part of the museum isn't rape.


True. Most of the great literary classics are rapey. Ovid just gives you more bang for your buck because of the anthological structure.
User avatar
Whit Dickman
Registered Broad
Posts: 3474
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 10:56 pm
Has given rep: 78 times
Received rep: 196 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #528 by Whit Dickman » Thu May 12, 2016 11:29 pm

Chaos Reigns wrote:
Whit Dickman wrote:But the trigger warning is one of the word combinations, dk.


Kiiiind of true, but to some extent that's the unpredictability of college climates that wish to remain harmful or not. Reasonable expectation. If I were a prof teaching Ovid I'd feel uncomfortable diving right in without a big ol TW, but if student orgs moved to ban it from campus or get me fired for teaching it, I'd fight that. I guess that's where I'd draw the line.


I think most would agree (including Fry, etc.)... the problem is determining where the line is. This is a very difficult task, unfortunately.
User avatar
Whit Dickman
Registered Broad
Posts: 3474
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 10:56 pm
Has given rep: 78 times
Received rep: 196 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #529 by Whit Dickman » Thu May 12, 2016 11:36 pm

Germz wrote:Trigger warnings may be nonsense much of the time but I think they are historically useful nonsense. So many young progressives seem obsessed with the idea of empathy as a social good. Hence the election of a Canadian PM with 'emotional intelligence'. And I do think that empathy is a social good. Yes, they are probably too obsessed. Yes, some of them are more interested in narcissism and self-aggrandizement under the guise of empathy. Young people do and say stupid things when they get ideologically invested in something they deem to be meaningful. 60s radicals did and said the stupidest things. The stupidest. And contemporary progressives have chosen to make empathy meaningful.

You can be on the right side of history and still be an idiot. That's youth culture at its best. The idiot part is pretty inevitable; the right side of history part is not.


I'm sympathetic to this point. The irony is that the SJW crowd is on the right side of history... but so are the rationalist atheists that so often argue with them. Perhaps, ultimately we need each other for the discourse to move along in the correct general direction.
User avatar
Sturminator
Registered Broad
Posts: 983
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:55 am
Received rep: 9 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #530 by Sturminator » Fri May 13, 2016 3:01 am

I like this bit:

Speaking out about abuse is a social faux pas. It's tacky; it's childish; it's attention seeking. You see, in order for the establishment to keep their power, victims of abuse must remain silent.

Ah..."the establishment"...everyone's favorite villain. It's so refreshing to see left and right finally on the same page, railing against the selfsame boogeyman. If we could only find these dirty establishment-types, I'd suggest a good round of beheadings.

This "decolonize our feels" narrative which rhetorically sets western colonialism at the heart of all human suffering is such a sad, reductive cul de sac. This girl talks about the need for people to "develop a language to talk about their experiences of marginalization", and then breaks out "colonialism" in a discussion of 21st century, mainland British social problems, as if colonialism had any but the most tangential relation to child abuse and homophobia. Way to "develop a language" there, sister. Colonialism does have something to do with racism, obviously, but this trick of pulling all the various banners of leftist grievance under the umbrella of anti-colonialism is more than a little bit stale.

In an argument from free speech, I'd have hoped for perspectives just a tad bit fresher, not just from this girl, but from the movement, as a whole. Do young people spouting this stuff not realize that this narrative is already old and creaky, practically an academic lemon party at this point? Do they not understand that, insofar as there is an "establishment" in academia, that they are actually supporting its worldview? Is it brave to "stand up and fight" where you have already won, are already in the majority? This girl doesn't study in Missouri or Johannesburg, and the victim card doesn't inspire empathy in all contexts. She definitely has sick boilerplate rhetorical skills, though, I'll give her that.

Regarding Ovid and the western canon...maybe the wise thing to do would simply be to teach the history of the west again on college campuses, with a great big trigger warning at the beginning that all of human history is traumatic in one way or another, so, before you open an old book, pull yourself together a bit. Is that unreasonable? The events in Ovid shouldn't be surprising to anyone with any sense who has not read the story, but knows the first thing about ancient Rome. Trauma warnings in academia aren't necessary for students who are not sheltered fools. The needed "warning" here should be implicit to any properly educated western university student.
User avatar
Sturminator
Registered Broad
Posts: 983
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:55 am
Received rep: 9 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #531 by Sturminator » Fri May 13, 2016 10:09 am

Chaos Reigns wrote:
Sturminator wrote: Do they not understand that, insofar as there is an "establishment" in academia, that they are actually supporting its worldview?


Not necessarily true anywhere except maybe Oberlin. Faculties are mostly failibs.

I presume this is the leftist version of a RINO? I'm glad there is a word for that.
User avatar
vf
Registered Broad
Posts: 11350
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 11:31 pm
Has given rep: 576 times
Received rep: 317 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #532 by vf » Fri May 13, 2016 12:16 pm

I hate acronyms. Can we all agree on that?
User avatar
TGR
Registered Broad
Posts: 1978
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 1:25 pm
Has given rep: 17 times
Received rep: 29 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #533 by TGR » Tue Jun 14, 2016 3:30 pm

Not gaming related, but I found this on a GitHub repository.

A few words on diversity in tech

I need to take some of your time. I can't believe we let shit like the Kathy Sierra incident or what happened to Brianna Wu happen over and over again. I can't believe we, the open source community, let sexist, misogynous shit happen over and over again.

I strongly believe that it is my — and your — duty to make the open source community, as well as the tech community at large, a community where everyone feel welcome and is accepted. At the very minimum, that means making sure the community and its forums both are safe, and are perceived as safe. It means being friendly and inclusive, even when you disagree with people. It means not shrugging off discussions about sexism and inclusiveness with handwaving about censorship and free speech. For a more elaborate document on what that means, the NPM Code of Conduct is a good start, Geek Feminism's resources for allies contains much more.

While I can't force anyone to do anything, if you happen to disagree with this, I ask of you not to use any of the open source I have published. Nor am I interested in contributions from people who can't accept or act respectfully towards other humans regardless of gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, ethnicity, religion, age, physical appearance, body size, race, or similar personal characteristics. If you think feminism, anti-racism or the LGBT movement is somehow wrong, disturbing or irrelevant, I ask you to go elsewhere to find software.


:superghey:
User avatar
Retardé S
Registered Broad
Posts: 18516
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 2:18 pm
Has given rep: 1044 times
Received rep: 1242 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #534 by Retardé S » Tue Jun 14, 2016 5:06 pm

Awful business decision
User avatar
TGR
Registered Broad
Posts: 1978
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 1:25 pm
Has given rep: 17 times
Received rep: 29 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #535 by TGR » Wed Jun 15, 2016 7:14 am

The guy is from Sweden so I'm not overly surprised.
User avatar
Slick Nick
Registered Broad
Posts: 7328
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:40 pm
Has given rep: 1085 times
Received rep: 679 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #536 by Slick Nick » Fri Jun 17, 2016 12:41 am

My favorite feminist of all times.

User avatar
Retardé S
Registered Broad
Posts: 18516
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 2:18 pm
Has given rep: 1044 times
Received rep: 1242 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #537 by Retardé S » Fri Jun 17, 2016 1:18 am

I think the correct term is SJW now. They've evolved.
User avatar
Slick Nick
Registered Broad
Posts: 7328
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:40 pm
Has given rep: 1085 times
Received rep: 679 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #538 by Slick Nick » Tue Jun 28, 2016 1:44 pm

User avatar
Slick Nick
Registered Broad
Posts: 7328
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:40 pm
Has given rep: 1085 times
Received rep: 679 times

Re: Gamer Gate (d_k is a self-loathing misandrist, but at least he's not Ernie)

Post #539 by Slick Nick » Sun Jul 03, 2016 4:02 am

Any alpha cuckholds here?

g-g-guys fb friend me.

Return to “Le mur de messages”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: SemrushBot and 1 guest