Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

..et d'autres discussions ennuyeuses
User avatar
Boring Choice #2
Posts: 6468
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 1979 6:06 am
Has given rep: 509 times
Received rep: 539 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3901 by Boring Choice #2 » Thu Sep 13, 2018 12:32 pm

Dog wrote:
Boring Choice #2 wrote:
Craig wrote:You didn't know your cousins growing up? Dude.


I didn't know my wife's cousins growing up. My cousins are definitely a conflict of interest. Hers, not so much.


We are assuming your wife may have some influence over you. Didn’t she make you fill out the census?


She wouldn't bother trying to make me fill out a census.

That's a big assumption that my wife would care enough about her cousin to want me to do something to improve their life. I think once you become an adult, you see your cousins once in a blue moon at a family wedding and ask them how their kids are. That's generally the relationship, at least as far as my experience.

I just think those conflict of interest rules a little bit excessive.
User avatar
shredz
Registered Broad
Posts: 33659
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 3:31 pm
Location: Rock Bottom, NY
Has given rep: 2013 times
Received rep: 1003 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3902 by shredz » Thu Sep 13, 2018 1:20 pm



We gon' drop the c!
User avatar
mayoradamwest
Registered Broad
Posts: 10412
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:38 pm
Has given rep: 366 times
Received rep: 202 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3903 by mayoradamwest » Fri Sep 14, 2018 1:26 pm

This peoples party sounds like it will be gloriously stupid
User avatar
MP
Registered Broad
Posts: 15310
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 1:13 pm
Location: :uoıʇɐɔoן
Has given rep: 144 times
Received rep: 328 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3904 by MP » Fri Sep 14, 2018 10:11 pm

One eyed purple people party eater...
User avatar
shredz
Registered Broad
Posts: 33659
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 3:31 pm
Location: Rock Bottom, NY
Has given rep: 2013 times
Received rep: 1003 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3905 by shredz » Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:33 am



cool.
User avatar
TittiesNBeer
Registered Broad
Posts: 4275
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2015 7:06 pm
Has given rep: 360 times
Received rep: 275 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3906 by TittiesNBeer » Wed Sep 19, 2018 1:10 pm



" The minimal “serious issue to be tried” component of that test assumes that the stay will operate as a temporary measure and that the rights of the parties will be finally resolved when the appeal proper is heard. However, RJR-MacDonald recognizes that in cases where, as a practical matter, the rights of the parties will be determined by the outcome of the stay motion, the court may give significantly more weight to the strength of the appeal: p. 338. In our view, this is such a case. An immediate decision is required to permit the Toronto municipal elections to proceed on October 22. That decision must be rendered now and, subject to further legislative intervention, our decision will determine whether the election proceeds on the basis of 25 or 47 wards. In these circumstances, greater attention must be paid to the merits of the constitutional claim and, as contemplated by RJR-MacDonald, we must ask whether there is a strong likelihood that the appeal will succeed.

[11] The application judge was understandably motivated by the fact that the timing of Bill 5 changed the rules for the election mid-campaign, which he perceived as being unfair to candidates and voters. However, unfairness alone does not establish a Charter breach. The question for the courts is not whether Bill 5 is unfair but whether it is unconstitutional. On that crucial question, we have concluded that there is a strong likelihood that application judge erred in law and that the Attorney General’s appeal to this court will succeed.

[12] The application judge’s interpretation appears to stretch both the wording and the purpose of s. 2(b) beyond the limits of that provision. His decision blurs the demarcation between two distinct provisions of the Charter: the protection of expressive activity in s. 2(b) and the s. 3 guarantee of the democratic rights of citizens to vote and be qualified for office. The s. 3 right to vote and stand for office applies only with respect to elections to the House of Commons and the provincial legislatures: Haig v. Canada, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 995, at pp. 1031, 1033. Section 3 does not apply to municipal elections and has no bearing on the issues raised in this case.

[13] Unquestionably, Ontario’s announcement of its intention to introduce Bill 5 disrupted the campaigns that were already underway. However, Bill 5 does not limit or restrict any message the candidates wish to convey to voters for the remainder of the campaign. Nor does it erase messages conveyed earlier, although it may reduce their effectiveness. While the change brought about by Bill 5 is undoubtedly frustrating for candidates who started campaigning in May 2018, we are not persuaded that their frustration amounts to a substantial interference with their freedom of expression. The candidates were and are still free to say what they want to say to the voters. The inconvenience candidates will experience because of the change from 47 to 25 wards does not prevent or impede them from saying what they want to say about the issues arising in the election.

[14] There was still considerable time from the date of Bill 5’s passage until voting day. Election campaigns inherently involve moving targets and changing issues that require candidates to adjust as matters proceed. Under Bill 5, nominations remained open until September 14, the same deadline that applied to the previous City elections. There is no suggestion that permitting nominations approximately 5 weeks before the election trammeled freedom of expression in any way by putting demands upon candidates who had already entered the race and who might need to strategically refocus their campaigns in response to issues raised by new candidates. In light of the time remaining for candidates to conduct their campaigns after its enactment, we are doubtful of the claim that the disruption Bill 5 caused constituted a substantial interference with the candidates’ freedom of expression."



In other words, the Ontario Court of Appeal agrees... Stupid, but Constitutional


:mkbét:
User avatar
Germz
Registered Broad
Posts: 4828
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 3:48 pm
Location: USA
Has given rep: 117 times
Received rep: 104 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3907 by Germz » Wed Sep 19, 2018 4:54 pm

This turned out to be a huge win for Ford. His personal vendettas are satisfied and his base is over the moon right now, and the kicker is he didn't even have to use the Notwithstanding clause.

Ethically of course it's despicable. But ethics are dead. Contemporary democracy is all about that base (no treble).
User avatar
Germz
Registered Broad
Posts: 4828
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 3:48 pm
Location: USA
Has given rep: 117 times
Received rep: 104 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3908 by Germz » Wed Sep 19, 2018 4:59 pm

Add in the Alleslev desertion and it's been a great week to be a Conservative in Ontario.
User avatar
AD
Posts: 23478
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Here
Has given rep: 510 times
Received rep: 612 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3909 by AD » Wed Sep 19, 2018 4:59 pm

Germz!
User avatar
mayoradamwest
Registered Broad
Posts: 10412
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:38 pm
Has given rep: 366 times
Received rep: 202 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3910 by mayoradamwest » Wed Sep 19, 2018 5:32 pm

Germz wrote:This turned out to be a huge win for Ford. His personal vendettas are satisfied and his base is over the moon right now, and the kicker is he didn't even have to use the Notwithstanding clause.

Ethically of course it's despicable. But ethics are dead. Contemporary democracy is all about that base (no treble).


I disagree.

He just blew a lot of political capital creating a very divisive issue for absolutely no legitimate reason. Yes, his base is over the moon - what don't they love about him? That nobody talked about this 3 months ago but miracously has unanimous support from his fanbase just tells you how empty they are. If his ideology is essentially revenge and pissing off certain groups to please his fans, this will flame out in the long run. We have our Tory streak in ontario, this isn't it.

I'm not sure how many people are going to even understand they didn't use the notwithstanding clause. Yeah the conservatives who hate the charter will sploosh, but more reasonable people will see that he is indifferent to the courts. This is, at its core, profoundly stupid. Why are we even talking about this? The national post and sun chains will never criticize him, but they can only sell so much so so many folks.


This is going to be more expensive. It flies in the face of localism, which is a key part of making good decisions. The list of why this is bad governing is quite long, and I don't think people who base their politics on ensuring liberals are angry are enough to create sustainable change.




Of course, maybe I am underestimating the effect of the non-star ontario news industry falling in line behind whatever he does

Historically, most Canadians support the charter and the courts more than our politicians.
User avatar
Germz
Registered Broad
Posts: 4828
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 3:48 pm
Location: USA
Has given rep: 117 times
Received rep: 104 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3911 by Germz » Wed Sep 19, 2018 6:32 pm

Sorry folks, my Yom Kippur fast got the better of me.

Now that I've eaten, I feel much better and agree with my dear old friend maw.
senate
Registered Broad
Posts: 10656
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:36 am
Has given rep: 259 times
Received rep: 465 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3912 by senate » Wed Sep 19, 2018 6:57 pm

Germz is Sandy Koufax confirmed.
User avatar
mayoradamwest
Registered Broad
Posts: 10412
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:38 pm
Has given rep: 366 times
Received rep: 202 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3913 by mayoradamwest » Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:01 pm

Germz wrote:Sorry folks, my Yom Kippur fast got the better of me.

Now that I've eaten, I feel much better and agree with my dear old friend maw.


Hugs.
User avatar
shredz
Registered Broad
Posts: 33659
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 3:31 pm
Location: Rock Bottom, NY
Has given rep: 2013 times
Received rep: 1003 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3914 by shredz » Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:19 am

User avatar
mayoradamwest
Registered Broad
Posts: 10412
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:38 pm
Has given rep: 366 times
Received rep: 202 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3915 by mayoradamwest » Thu Sep 20, 2018 12:00 pm

I mean, why wouldn't the premier of ontario love the guy who is threatening tariffs that would grind our economy to a halt?
User avatar
AD
Posts: 23478
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Here
Has given rep: 510 times
Received rep: 612 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3916 by AD » Thu Sep 20, 2018 12:05 pm

In terms of economics. I mean.
User avatar
shredz
Registered Broad
Posts: 33659
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 3:31 pm
Location: Rock Bottom, NY
Has given rep: 2013 times
Received rep: 1003 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3917 by shredz » Fri Sep 21, 2018 8:42 am

I would have said "egonomics" just to get a tweet from Trump. :colbert:
User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 9280
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 151 times
Received rep: 471 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3918 by Dr_Chimera » Tue Sep 25, 2018 7:31 pm

User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 9280
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 151 times
Received rep: 471 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3919 by Dr_Chimera » Wed Sep 26, 2018 2:32 pm

User avatar
chicpea
Registered Broad
Posts: 6433
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:09 pm
Location: lagoons or ditches
Has given rep: 732 times
Received rep: 467 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3920 by chicpea » Mon Oct 01, 2018 1:58 am

USMCA. Ch 19. H2O starring Paul Gross
senate
Registered Broad
Posts: 10656
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:36 am
Has given rep: 259 times
Received rep: 465 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3921 by senate » Mon Oct 01, 2018 8:52 am

I'm curious to see how NAFTA 2.0 is going to get through Congress. Unless the Republicans can ram it through in the lame duck session, I think there is a good chance that we will have to come back and negotiate NAFTA 2.1 in 2020.
User avatar
chicpea
Registered Broad
Posts: 6433
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:09 pm
Location: lagoons or ditches
Has given rep: 732 times
Received rep: 467 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3922 by chicpea » Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:48 am

I’m off to work. I’m going to require several takes on this throughout the day so please keep this thread scorching hot.
senate
Registered Broad
Posts: 10656
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:36 am
Has given rep: 259 times
Received rep: 465 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3923 by senate » Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:59 am

Looks like American Super Bowl commercials are going away. Under NAFTA 2, Canada can not exclude specific programs from simultaneous substitution.
User avatar
mayoradamwest
Registered Broad
Posts: 10412
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:38 pm
Has given rep: 366 times
Received rep: 202 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3924 by mayoradamwest » Mon Oct 01, 2018 11:59 am

Yay, we changed the name!
User avatar
shredz
Registered Broad
Posts: 33659
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 3:31 pm
Location: Rock Bottom, NY
Has given rep: 2013 times
Received rep: 1003 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3925 by shredz » Sun Oct 07, 2018 10:10 am

User avatar
mayoradamwest
Registered Broad
Posts: 10412
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:38 pm
Has given rep: 366 times
Received rep: 202 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3926 by mayoradamwest » Sun Oct 07, 2018 10:33 am

The TPP we just signed to update NAFTA is decent. :dunno:
User avatar
shredz
Registered Broad
Posts: 33659
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 3:31 pm
Location: Rock Bottom, NY
Has given rep: 2013 times
Received rep: 1003 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3927 by shredz » Sun Oct 07, 2018 10:52 am

mayoradamwest wrote:The TPP we just signed to update NAFTA is decent. :dunno:


You mean the AMERICA-Mexico-Canada treatise?
User avatar
PredsFan77
Posts: 16758
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:53 am
Location: 7 TIME LOUNGE JEOPARDY CHAMP!!!
Has given rep: 136 times
Received rep: 463 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3928 by PredsFan77 » Mon Oct 08, 2018 2:34 pm

happy thanksgiving, someone just blew up your largest refinery.
CDX.NA.IG.9









[LEFT]Image[/LEFT]
User avatar
chicpea
Registered Broad
Posts: 6433
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:09 pm
Location: lagoons or ditches
Has given rep: 732 times
Received rep: 467 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3929 by chicpea » Mon Oct 08, 2018 4:11 pm

We have too many refineries anyway. Everything is quite refined here. It's basically like that movie The Crown but in the 14th Century and every citizen has corgis which they are given at birth.
User avatar
mcphee
Registered Broad
Posts: 13516
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:27 am
Has given rep: 137 times
Received rep: 406 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3930 by mcphee » Mon Oct 08, 2018 5:35 pm

chicpea wrote:We have too many refineries anyway. Everything is quite refined here. It's basically like that movie The Crown but in the 14th Century and every citizen has corgis which they are given at birth.

a poorly thought out tradition as the lifespan of the corgi means that most Canadians approach puberty depressed over their dead dogs
User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 9280
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 151 times
Received rep: 471 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3931 by Dr_Chimera » Tue Oct 09, 2018 10:55 pm

Thread:



User avatar
Shawnathan Horcoff
Registered Broad
Posts: 17014
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 7:51 am
Has given rep: 542 times
Received rep: 708 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3932 by Shawnathan Horcoff » Wed Oct 10, 2018 11:51 am

Fuck Arabistan.

And that’s the final word.
Also, let's keep this thread about Galchenyuk's on-ice performance, development and value and NOT bring in his personal life or race.
User avatar
shredz
Registered Broad
Posts: 33659
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 3:31 pm
Location: Rock Bottom, NY
Has given rep: 2013 times
Received rep: 1003 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3933 by shredz » Wed Oct 10, 2018 11:59 am

User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 9280
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 151 times
Received rep: 471 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3934 by Dr_Chimera » Wed Oct 10, 2018 12:45 pm

I think Horak is probably correct in his criticisms of Canada's twitter diplomacy. If they wish to maintain a friendly relationship with the Saudis then it seems awfully hypocritical to chastise them on social media while simultaneously engaging in weapons trading and keeping silent on the Saudi war in Yemen.

Either you reject their awfulness outright or tread very carefully. And Canada will never do the former unless the US does it first.
User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 9280
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 151 times
Received rep: 471 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3935 by Dr_Chimera » Wed Oct 10, 2018 12:51 pm

Dog wrote:https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/national-dennis-horak-ambassador-saudi-arabia-interview-1.4855353

Still don’t know how I feel about this. Like not from a is the Trudeau admin grandstanding or being legit point of view (who cares), but from a strategy point of view. Is isolation the best approach to opening up a regime or is a longer term cooperative approach more effective. I think it’s probably a mix. Carrot and stick type of thing. That said, Western Govs are far too much in bed with the Saudi Royals for commercial reasons. That said, what’s the alternative? They are likely moderates compared to the theocracy that would most likely emerge. That said, did the arabs need to go through arab spring adolescence and chaos to long term come off better (even with short term pain/regressing).

Not too sure on which foot to dance on these things. Tempted to say you are patient and work with them as long as you are seeing progress and if not, pull back. And if you are primarily acting out of greed, then go shoot yourself.

Kinda sticking with the Trudeau admin on this.


Making incremental progress with billion-dollar weapons deals.
senate
Registered Broad
Posts: 10656
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:36 am
Has given rep: 259 times
Received rep: 465 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3936 by senate » Wed Oct 10, 2018 12:59 pm

The poor CBC really mistimed their story. Any outrage discussion they thought they'd generate has been drowned out by the Khashoggi assassination.
User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 9280
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 151 times
Received rep: 471 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3937 by Dr_Chimera » Wed Oct 10, 2018 1:03 pm

Dog wrote:And yes, they’d still take their money and sell them arms. Rather, they would not go out of their way to scuttle it. They welcomed it. Politics. Jerbs. Money. Pragmatism. Not your ideal, but that’s not the sole standard to judge actions in the world.


Not following you here.
User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 9280
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 151 times
Received rep: 471 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3938 by Dr_Chimera » Wed Oct 10, 2018 3:21 pm

Dog wrote:Freeland/foreign affairs can lead from a more principled position and not imply that the whole Canadian government has to be fully coherent behind that and turn down $15B deals. In a perfect world, you’d want full coherence accross the board. In this world, the fact they don’t go as far as to scuttle $15B deals doesn’t mean their arabic tweets were empty headed measures.


I don't know what your definition of "principled position" is, but it is obviously not the same as mine. Signing billion-dollar deals with dictatorships that fund wars of aggression is morally wrong. The Trudeau liberals cannot offer a strong moral vision while at the same time profiting from these deals and downplaying their involvement in them.

The Trudeau liberals want Canada to look clean while at the same time getting their hands dirty.
User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 9280
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 151 times
Received rep: 471 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3939 by Dr_Chimera » Wed Oct 10, 2018 4:32 pm

Dog wrote:I think I clearly distinguished as a « principled position » the stance on the Badawis from foreign affairs as opposed to the less principled position, from other parts of the gov, to not flush a $15B deal to make a point. If you don’t want to make that distinction and paint everything with the same moral outrage brush, that’s fine. I can sorta hold the two thoughts in my mind « hey, Freeland took a principled stance on this even if the government as a whole didn’t go so far as to scuttle a $15B order ».


The Trudeau liberals took the Badawi stance because they believed that it wouldn't cost them anything and it turned out that they were wrong. They like making empty gestures in order to flatter themselves.

Cancelling the arms deal would actually cost us a lot, economically-speaking, but this is where the test of one's true moral courage is on display. This is where one cannot simply style themselves as a champion of human rights, because either you are or you aren't.

Canada has been on record saying that they will stop the export of military goods to the Saudis if "there is a reasonable risk of human rights abuses." But they have shown no real commitment to doing so and have ignored many facts that demonstrate that human rights abuses have been committed with the use of their weapons.

Anthony Fenton, an academic who follows Canada’s arms exports to the Middle East, uses local reports and photos posted to social media to track the use of Canadian weapons in Yemen. Many of the images come from the military itself — what Fenton calls “Saudi selfies” — and appear to show Canadian equipment being used by the Saudis or Emirates on Yemen’s border or within its towns. Though they are difficult to verify, the sheer number of sightings posted by civilians or players on all sides of the conflict provide a damning body of evidence, according to Fenton.

“There is not a shred of doubt Canadian equipment is being used in Yemen,” he said. “We track this on a daily basis and there hasn’t been a week since this war began that there hasn’t been some sighting of Canadian goods being used.”


Freeland’s spokesperson said if the government had evidence a Canadian-exported weapon was being deployed other than for its “authorized end use,” Freeland would cancel future export permits associated with the sale. But how does Ottawa monitor weapons once they’re in the hands of another country? Global Affairs did not answer.

Fenton said he didn’t think Canadian officials did “much of anything” to monitor Canadian weapons after they’re sold. “What could they do? They’d have to have personnel embedded with the military with a notepad. The point is they shouldn’t be sold in the first place,” he said.


Source: https://www.thestar.com/news/investigat ... untry.html

The fact that you refer to these sales, and their economic benefit to Canada, as "pragmatic" says a lot about you and other people who are willing to place a lot of distance between themselves and the consequences of their actions.
User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 9280
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 151 times
Received rep: 471 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3940 by Dr_Chimera » Wed Oct 10, 2018 5:15 pm

Dog wrote:I’m saying foreign affairs likely consciously decided to be bold and push the limits of « acceptable diplomacy » by tweeting in arabic with directive language. That may be small potatoes, but it’s still more potatoes than what any other western gov was willing to do. And, much as you may hate it, incremental progress can have effect even if it comes from a place of concession and less than idealistic action.


Actually this is far less than what other Western governments have been willing to do. If you'd read the article I've just posted you would see that European countries are enforcing embargoes against the Saudis and ending their past practices of arms sales:

The European Parliament passed a non-binding resolution in 2016 calling on all member states to enforce an arms embargo against Saudi Arabia for its role in Yemen. The Netherlands was first to take up the call. Finland and Norway have since stopped selling weapons to the United Arab Emirates. Earlier this year, Germany declared an end to arms sales to all parties involved in Yemen’s war.


Canada is becoming isolated, along with UK and the US, in being among those still willing to sell weapons to the Saudis for their murderous wars. You see pragmatism and incremental progress. I am seeing Canada falling behind international human rights standards. Still pretending to be leading the way, but actually - excuse me, pragmatically - scraping the bottom of the barrel.

And yes, we are all involved. You didn't personally sell these weapons to the Saudis, nor did I. But we are Canadian citizens and it matters what we do and say about this right now. "Incremental progress" isn't it.
User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 9280
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 151 times
Received rep: 471 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3941 by Dr_Chimera » Wed Oct 10, 2018 11:14 pm

In the new USMCA, Canada cannot sign trade deals with any "non market" economy (e.g., China) without America's permission. If you believe that China is the next great economic power, this might hurt us in the future.

senate
Registered Broad
Posts: 10656
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:36 am
Has given rep: 259 times
Received rep: 465 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3942 by senate » Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:31 am

If America wants to have a hissy fit and cancel NAFTA 2 because Canada or Mexico entered a trade deal with China then America will do it whether there is a clause in NAFTA 2 that allowed it or not. Section 32.10 is a meaningless "win" for America because it is just a statement of reality.
User avatar
mayoradamwest
Registered Broad
Posts: 10412
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:38 pm
Has given rep: 366 times
Received rep: 202 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3943 by mayoradamwest » Sat Oct 13, 2018 7:18 pm

let's object to the TPP as we transform NAFTA into the TPP....
User avatar
Shawnathan Horcoff
Registered Broad
Posts: 17014
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 7:51 am
Has given rep: 542 times
Received rep: 708 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3944 by Shawnathan Horcoff » Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:19 am

Lose your illusions. It's an ugly, dystopian world. Image

A few thoughts on the Republic of Dystopia, our southern neighbour, and the Kingdom of Draconia, Canada's most violent and temperamental weapons customer.

A second man credibly accused of sexual misconduct now sits on the Supreme Court of the United States. The story is over, and Americans quickly moved on. As they do.

Ultimately, all Christine Blasey Ford — the woman who alleged Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her back in high school — received for her rather courageous decision to testify on live television was cruel ridicule from her savage, braying president, and guffaws from the simple-minded flying monkeys he commands at his rallies.

Her testimony never had a chance of changing anything, as she herself acknowledged early in the process. Anyone who thinks the outcome could have been different should take a moment and read a NPR/PBS Newshour/Marist poll taken late last month. It received far too little attention.

Marist pollsters asked approximately 1,000 men and women voters whether, "if the charge of sexual assault during a party in high school by Christine Blasey Ford against Brett Kavanaugh is true, do you think Brett Kavanaugh should be confirmed …?"

Fifty-four per cent of Republicans, 12 per cent of Democrats, and 31 per cent of independents said yes.

Think about that a moment. More than half the Republicans and significant factions of Democrats and independents were keen to see Kavanaugh confirmedeven if Ford's accusation was proven true. Put more bluntly, they would have been happy seeing a rapist (or attempted rapist) seated on the court. If Ford had shown up with video of the assault she says Kavanaugh inflicted on her back in his prep school days, it would have made no difference to them.

It's a stunning statistic, until you remember that millions of Americans voted for President Donald Trump, who was caught bragging on tape about committing sexual assault, and who stands accused by around 20 women.

Social justice advocates would say it's all got to do with the emboldenment of white male rage against loss of entitlement, and there's no doubt that motivation exists. There's a reason Trump portrays the #MeToo movement as a barrage of life-ruining false accusations against men.

But it's more than that. White women broke for Trump in 2016, and significant numbers of white women, with and without college educations, would have seated Kavanaugh even after seeing hard evidence of guilt, the Marist poll suggests.

As, too, would have almost half of the respondents who identified as white Evangelical Christians. Because, you know, better an anti-abortion sexual predator than a liberal baby murderer.

And then there's the motivation often planted by right-wing commentators under stories on news websites. They're basically for anything they think will "make liberals' heads explode." And their hero is the chief exploder. Thanks to them, Trump was able to wave off his own piggish admissions as "locker room talk." Had there been tape of Kavanaugh assaulting Ford, it would no doubt have been accepted as wacky locker room hijinks.

It's increasingly apparent Trump represents Americans better than any of his predecessors. I'm willing to bet his fellow Dystopians will elect him to a second term.

But sexual assault isn't the only crime met with a shrug from the highest echelons of the United States. Cold-blooded murder is fine, too, as long as the perpetrators are willing to buy American.

It's becoming pretty clear that the crazed princeling of Draconia, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, likely dispatched a 15-man assassination squad with a bone saw to slaughter and carve up the bothersome expat journalist Jamal Khashoggi, who visited the theocracy's embassy in Turkey last month for marriage-related documents. There may actually be a recording of the execution; Turkish intelligence, the regime in Ankara is suggesting to journalists, has a copy.

Khashoggi was an American resident and wrote for the Washington Post, among other outlets, criticizing the Saudi regime.

Such criticism clearly drives Prince Mohammed nuts, as Canada discovered last summer, when he decreed a series of sanctions against Canada in reply to a relatively mild expression of concern by our foreign affairs minister about his family's human rights record.

As it turns out, U.S. intelligence agents intercepted Saudi discussions about abducting Khashoggi, but reportedly said nothing, just as Donald Trump, who professes great affection for the crown prince and his family, has said just about nothing, other than to remark, after speaking with the Saudi king, that it might have been "rogue killers," and to assure reporters the Saudi monarch "flatly denies" executing Khashoggi, in much the same way as Trump rushed to accept President Vladimir Putin's flat denial that Russia meddled in the 2016 American election.

(To be fair to Trump, the United States has a history of generosity and offering the benefit of doubt where the Saudis are concerned . Remember, the U.S. government, even as it rounded up thousands of innocent Muslims living on American soil in the days after the 9/11 attacks, and contemplated attacking Iraq in retaliation, allowed the family of Osama Bin Laden — who actually directed the team of mostly Saudi extremists who carried out the attacks — to fly back to sanctuary in Saudi within days of the attack as the Twin Towers lay in smoking ruins).

Should the United States curtail shipment of American weapons to the Saudis — weapons that the Saudis then use to slaughter civilians wholesale in Yemen?

Absolutely not, says Trump, at whose hotels the Saudis spend lavishly. Besides, Khashoggi wasn't an American citizen, he adds. No doubt the White House is trying to figure out some way to blame all this on Iran.

But it's not Iran, it's America's closest Arab pals. The same bunch Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland surely wants to flatter back into a fond relationship here. Canada sells the Saudis billions in weapons systems too, after all, and we need those medical residents Mohammed bin Salman threatened to yank from our underfunded hospitals.

People my age grew up believing the world, led by the West, was becoming ever more progressive. It wasn't, and it isn't. All it took was one ambitious real estate huckster to dispel the illusion.
Also, let's keep this thread about Galchenyuk's on-ice performance, development and value and NOT bring in his personal life or race.
User avatar
AD
Posts: 23478
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Here
Has given rep: 510 times
Received rep: 612 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3945 by AD » Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:36 am

"Actions".. you mean potential criminality?

The poll was presuming that the criminal behaviour was assumed true, would that disqualify him.

It would disqualify him as a lawyer, and judge, let alone to be confirmed on the Supreme Court.

Give your head a shake, dog.
User avatar
AD
Posts: 23478
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Here
Has given rep: 510 times
Received rep: 612 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3946 by AD » Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:52 am

Dog wrote:
AD wrote:"Actions".. you mean potential criminality?

The poll was presuming that the criminal behaviour was assumed true, would that disqualify him.

It would disqualify him as a lawyer, and judge, let alone to be confirmed on the Supreme Court.

Give your head a shake, dog.


It doesn’t...automatically. Not if he fesses up and eventually gets pardoned.

That poll is in hypothetical land. “Does a crime 30 years ago automatically disqualify you”. I think the answer to that should be no, you have to also look at what’s happened since.


The poll wasn't. Look at the question: Are the charges by Ford... i.e., rape.

Rape dog.

Rape disqualifies you from being one of the 9 most important judges in the biggest justice system in the world. Yes.
User avatar
Craig
Registered Broad
Posts: 18118
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:33 pm
Location: Toronto
Has given rep: 30 times
Received rep: 375 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3947 by Craig » Tue Oct 16, 2018 12:27 pm

Yes.
User avatar
TittiesNBeer
Registered Broad
Posts: 4275
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2015 7:06 pm
Has given rep: 360 times
Received rep: 275 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3948 by TittiesNBeer » Tue Oct 16, 2018 12:33 pm

Yeah im on board with SCOTUS judges should never have committed attempted rape at any point in their lives.
User avatar
Craig
Registered Broad
Posts: 18118
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:33 pm
Location: Toronto
Has given rep: 30 times
Received rep: 375 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3949 by Craig » Tue Oct 16, 2018 12:33 pm

My reason for saying that isn't about bro boi or his potential performance as a SC justice. It's because of the message that sends to the public and other victims of sexual assault. Elevating someone like that to such a high and public position is a terrible message and a net drain on society. Go find someone else who hasn't raped.
User avatar
Craig
Registered Broad
Posts: 18118
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:33 pm
Location: Toronto
Has given rep: 30 times
Received rep: 375 times

Re: Maybe a joke about Bill Morneau ... if not Greg

Post #3950 by Craig » Tue Oct 16, 2018 12:36 pm

? It's literally what you said.

Return to “Le mur de messages”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest