BKL rulebook

cawbber · Post #51 by **cawbber** » Fri Aug 29, 2014 7:58 am

MP wrote:69+5+5bonus

that last +5 is temporary though, no?

MP · Post #52 by MP » Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:01 am

cob wrote:that last +5 is temporary though, no?

Yes, it's the rookie bonus till Nov. 1, and reapplys two week before the trade deadline, as a trade incentive.

mayoradamwest · Post #53 by **mayoradamwest** » Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:02 am

MP wrote:69+5+5bonus

so through the majority of the season, we have to stay under 74?

MP · Post #54 by MP » Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:02 am

mayoradamwest wrote:so through the majority of the season, we have to stay under 74?

Or at, yes.

MP · Post #55 by MP » Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:31 am

dempsey_k wrote:MP is correct, except the two weeks thing before trade deadline - each year we kinda go eh whatever and do it a few days or a week before depending on the transit of the moon.

One doesn't form a dynasty without knowing the rules....

chicpea · Post #56 by **chicpea** » Fri Aug 29, 2014 12:36 pm

MP wrote:One doesn't form a dynasty without knowing the rules....

This is quite and very truth.

19nazzy · Post #57 by **19nazzy** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 5:42 pm

Was it ever solved on what is happening on players with a cap hit split among different teams?

cawbber · Post #58 by **cawbber** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 5:46 pm

19nazzy wrote:Was it ever solved on what is happening on players with a cap hit split among different teams?

The aggregate caphit stands

MP · Post #59 by MP » Thu Aug 27, 2015 7:23 pm

19nazzy wrote:Was it ever solved on what is happening on players with a cap hit split among different teams?

We will go with whatever Fantrax does for this season. In the off season at our AGM we will make a final decision of this and other rules like cap retention, etc.

HS · Post #60 by HS » Thu Aug 27, 2015 7:26 pm

MP wrote:
19nazzy wrote:Was it ever solved on what is happening on players with a cap hit split among different teams?

We will go with whatever Fantrax does for this season. In the off season at our AGM we will make a final decision of this and other rules like cap retention, etc.

Cap rentention sounds like a great idea, but I don't know if Fantrax can implement that.

MP · Post #61 by MP » Thu Aug 27, 2015 7:27 pm

HS wrote:
MP wrote:
19nazzy wrote:Was it ever solved on what is happening on players with a cap hit split among different teams?

We will go with whatever Fantrax does for this season. In the off season at our AGM we will make a final decision of this and other rules like cap retention, etc.

Cap rentention sounds like a great idea, but I don't know if Fantrax can implement that.

I've sent a message to Fantrax about it already.

19nazzy · Post #62 by **19nazzy** » Mon Nov 30, 2015 9:03 pm

Can we get some clarification on when a guy needs to be placed on the active roster once being called up by the team. I've had guys come up and down within a day or two of each other but not catch it. But they didn't play a game, is it the same as IR players where if they play in a game they need to come up within a day?

MP · Post #63 by MP » Mon Nov 30, 2015 9:06 pm

If he's called up, he counts against your cap. You've got till the team plays to set it right.

cawbber · Post #64 by **cawbber** » Tue Dec 01, 2015 1:29 pm

did we, or are we going to implement a rule about the number of minor leaguers on your active roster?

VLoo · Post #65 by **VLoo** » Tue Dec 01, 2015 1:32 pm

I could be wrong, but I think we are implementing a Jacobellis v. Ohio ruling. We'll know it when we see it.

MP · Post #66 by MP » Tue Dec 01, 2015 1:52 pm

cob wrote:did we, or are we going to implement a rule about the number of minor leaguers on your active roster?

We decided that tightening up the minimum games played was more enforceable and amicable way to prevent tanking with minor league players.

HS · Post #67 by HS » Tue Dec 01, 2015 2:44 pm

FYI, Boltsfan was not tanking. Still isn't as far as I know.

cawbber · Post #68 by **cawbber** » Tue Dec 01, 2015 6:32 pm

MP wrote:
cob wrote:did we, or are we going to implement a rule about the number of minor leaguers on your active roster?

We decided that tightening up the minimum games played was more enforceable and amicable way to prevent tanking with minor league players.

and what's penalty for not reaching min games played?

MP · Post #69 by MP » Tue Dec 01, 2015 7:41 pm

cob wrote:
MP wrote:
cob wrote:did we, or are we going to implement a rule about the number of minor leaguers on your active roster?

We decided that tightening up the minimum games played was more enforceable and amicable way to prevent tanking with minor league players.

and what's penalty for not reaching min games played?

It's in the OP:
"+21GP - 1st Round draft pick
16-20GP - 2nd Round draft pick
11-15GP - 3rd Round draft pick
6-10GP - 4th Round draft pick
1-5GP - 5th Round draft pick"

I would have made it stiffer in the off season, but my suggestion was voted down.

HS · Post #70 by HS » Tue Dec 01, 2015 7:54 pm

MP wrote:
cob wrote:
MP wrote:We decided that tightening up the minimum games played was more enforceable and amicable way to prevent tanking with minor league players.

and what's penalty for not reaching min games played?

It's in the OP:
"+21GP - 1st Round draft pick
16-20GP - 2nd Round draft pick
11-15GP - 3rd Round draft pick
6-10GP - 4th Round draft pick
1-5GP - 5th Round draft pick"

I would have made it stiffer in the off season, but my suggestion was voted down.

Of course you would make it stiffer. It hurts the teams that are weak, while benefiting the good teams with goaltending already entrenched. GG.

Lifer · Post #71 by **Lifer** » Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:59 pm

I still think the simplest and most fair way to deal with this is to straight up ban green flags on the NHL roster except for something like a 1-2 day window to allow time if somebody gets sent down.

That method is impartial to anyone except those who are obviously trying to tank/hoard, which is the ultimate thing we're trying to squelch with this right?

OK nevermind...

MP · Post #72 by MP » Thu Dec 03, 2015 8:56 am

Frankly, there is no reason everyone can't make the maximums at this point. If we do anything we should further tighten up the range of acceptable game played. The green flag thing then becomes irrelevant.

19nazzy · Post #73 by **19nazzy** » Thu Dec 03, 2015 9:35 am

Lifer wrote:I still think the simplest and most fair way to deal with this is to straight up ban green flags on the NHL roster except for something like a 1-2 day window to allow time if somebody gets sent down.

That method is impartial to anyone except those who are obviously trying to tank/hoard, which is the ultimate thing we're trying to squelch with this right?

OK nevermind...

How would banning green flags work? I'm by no means tanking but I need to manage having one or two up because I was projected to be over in a couple areas. And if I don't have them up, I don't get points for the day. The narrow window of GPs necessitates the ability to use green flag players.

MP wrote:Frankly, there is no reason everyone can't make the maximums at this point. If we do anything we should further tighten up the range of acceptable game played. The green flag thing then becomes irrelevant.

I was in trouble with the goalie situation at the beginning but as I basically sacrificed a few guys to pick up a bunch of backups, I should make it.

Craig · Post #74 by **Craig** » Thu Dec 03, 2015 10:56 pm

This doesn't feel like an actual problem any more.

HS · Post #75 by HS » Tue Mar 22, 2016 5:38 pm

MP wrote:
cob wrote:did we, or are we going to implement a rule about the number of minor leaguers on your active roster?

We decided that tightening up the minimum games played was more enforceable and amicable way to prevent tanking with minor league players.

Dundundundundundun.

MP · Post #76 by MP » Tue Mar 22, 2016 5:39 pm

What are you on about now HS?

HS · Post #77 by HS » Tue Mar 22, 2016 5:46 pm

MP wrote:What are you on about now HS?

There's some whining in Fantrax chat.

cawbber · Post #78 by **cawbber** » Thu Mar 24, 2016 3:40 am

HS wrote:
MP wrote:What are you on about now HS?

There's some whining in Fantrax chat.

you're a stupid cunt.

seriously

chicpea · Post #79 by **chicpea** » Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:11 pm

cob wrote:
HS wrote:
MP wrote:What are you on about now HS?

There's some whining in Fantrax chat.

you're a stupid cunt.

seriously

I was going to suggest putting this to a poll but I realised it's really not necessary.

HS · Post #80 by HS » Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:38 pm

cob wrote:
HS wrote:
MP wrote:What are you on about now HS?

There's some whining in Fantrax chat.

you're a stupid cunt.

HS · Post #81 by HS » Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:38 pm

chiclet wrote:
cob wrote:
HS wrote:
There's some whining in Fantrax chat.

you're a stupid cunt.

seriously

I was going to suggest putting this to a poll but I realised it's really not necessary.

cawbber · Post #82 by **cawbber** » Fri Mar 25, 2016 6:17 pm

chiclet wrote:
cob wrote:
HS wrote:
There's some whining in Fantrax chat.

you're a stupid cunt.

seriously

I was going to suggest putting this to a poll but I realised it's really not necessary.

#contraction

Craig · Post #83 by **Craig** » Thu Sep 15, 2016 9:37 pm

Hmm. Shit.

Dempsey asked me to delete his account and purge all traces. It didn't occur to me that would include our rulebook.

Um... Sorry?

cawbber · Post #84 by **cawbber** » Thu Sep 15, 2016 9:41 pm

http://www.fantrax.com/newui/fantasy/le ... wqinbybdz4

Can use this as a base template and add as necessary.

Craig · Post #85 by **Craig** » Thu Sep 15, 2016 9:46 pm

I pulled the version from the migration. Any changes in the last year or so might be missing.

Craig · Post #86 by **Craig** » Thu Sep 15, 2016 9:50 pm

Thanks, I put it in the first post too.

vonbonds · Post #87 by **vonbonds** » Thu Sep 15, 2016 10:24 pm

Craig, I do a DB dump every day in case of tomfoolery. You can always restore to make a new test area and extract it if that's really important to you guys.

Kraapo 4 Kaapo · Post #88 by **Kraapo 4 Kaapo** » Thu Sep 15, 2016 10:27 pm

Craig wrote:Hmm. Shit.

Dempsey asked me to delete his account and purge all traces. It didn't occur to me that would include our rulebook.

Um... Sorry?

Good riddance.

Craig · Post #89 by **Craig** » Thu Sep 15, 2016 10:54 pm

vonbonds wrote:Craig, I do a DB dump every day in case of tomfoolery. You can always restore to make a new test area and extract it if that's really important to you guys.

Yeah, I know there are backups, but that's like, work.

vonbonds · Post #90 by **vonbonds** » Thu Sep 15, 2016 11:00 pm

Craig wrote:
vonbonds wrote:Craig, I do a DB dump every day in case of tomfoolery. You can always restore to make a new test area and extract it if that's really important to you guys.

Yeah, I know there are backups, but that's like, work.

I like the cut of your jib

PredsFan77 · Post #91 by **PredsFan77** » Fri Sep 16, 2016 12:33 am

I do a dump everyday too, usually. Doing one as we speak

Lifer · Post #92 by **Lifer** » Fri Sep 16, 2016 7:24 am

PredsFan77 wrote:I do a dump everyday too, usually. Doing one as we speak

Doing one right now. I'll have another to do in about an hour after I've had my morning coffee.

19nazzy · Post #93 by **19nazzy** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 10:34 pm

Can someone update the first post with how the draft works please. There's nothing about how the order reverts back to the standings after the first round, snake draft, etc..

Just trying to sort out how I'm planning for the next year before my pick and it would be nice if it is clear.

cawbber · Post #94 by **cawbber** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 10:37 pm

19nazzy wrote:Can someone update the first post with how the draft works please. There's nothing about how the order reverts back to the standings after the first round, snake draft, etc..

Just trying to sort out how I'm planning for the next year before my pick and it would be nice if it is clear.

Not a snake. Follow the order.

MP · Post #95 by MP » Mon Sep 19, 2016 10:39 pm

Yeah, I need to double check that draft order tomorrow. The first round is right...

Just to be clear there is no snake and no reverting to original standings.

The rulebook is one of my many priorities when I find the time....

19nazzy · Post #96 by **19nazzy** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 10:40 pm

The draft order looks like it's snaking to me, I have the 2nd to last pick and then the 2nd pick in the subsequent round on basically each go round.
e:
I'm picking 2nd or 14th for my own draft picks

Also, how we're basing the draft standings on FP/G going forward I think?

cawbber · Post #97 by **cawbber** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 10:45 pm

19nazzy wrote:The draft order looks like it's snaking to me, I have the 2nd to last pick and then the 2nd pick in the subsequent round on basically each go round.
e:
I'm picking 2nd or 14th for my own draft picks

Also, how we're basing the draft standings on FP/G going forward I think?

There's no snake, and there has never been one

19nazzy · Post #98 by **19nazzy** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 10:46 pm

cawbber wrote:
19nazzy wrote:The draft order looks like it's snaking to me, I have the 2nd to last pick and then the 2nd pick in the subsequent round on basically each go round.
e:
I'm picking 2nd or 14th for my own draft picks

Also, how we're basing the draft standings on FP/G going forward I think?

There's no snake, and there has never been one

The draft order is wrong then

MP · Post #99 by MP » Mon Sep 19, 2016 10:46 pm

Yes, for the 2017 draft.

MP · Post #100 by MP » Mon Sep 19, 2016 10:48 pm

19nazzy wrote:
cawbber wrote:
19nazzy wrote:The draft order looks like it's snaking to me, I have the 2nd to last pick and then the 2nd pick in the subsequent round on basically each go round.
e:
I'm picking 2nd or 14th for my own draft picks

Also, how we're basing the draft standings on FP/G going forward I think?

There's no snake, and there has never been one

The draft order is wrong then

Indeed it is. My fault for just copying the first post I saw. Will fix tomorrow.

Who is online