Scott Parker
- HowardBrazee
- Registered Broad
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:37 pm
- Location: Lafayette, CO
Scott Parker
Today was the 2nd day when the Denver Post had articles about enforcers and Scott Parker's health. He was on the cover of the paper (Saturday?). Here's one article:
http://www.denverpost.com/avalanche/ci_24631033/former-avs-enforcer-scott-parker-battling-effects-concussions
http://www.denverpost.com/avalanche/ci_24631033/former-avs-enforcer-scott-parker-battling-effects-concussions
That's brutal and I really hope that science is currently capable of, or is able to advance enough to provide him an every day life again. Same for other athletes, soldiers, normal citizens, and so on affected by head trauma.
I'm on the fence about eliminating fighting altogether right now, I see both the advantages and disadvantages in doing so. Ultimately I think it simply needs to be removed and have judicious, objective disciplining of on-ice actions by a governing body as the mitigating factor to cheap shots, etc., as a deterrent. The problem is getting that objectivity going and having it be enforced thoroughly even for actions that don't directly lead to injuries. Without that it's impossible to make fighting illegal.
I'm on the fence about eliminating fighting altogether right now, I see both the advantages and disadvantages in doing so. Ultimately I think it simply needs to be removed and have judicious, objective disciplining of on-ice actions by a governing body as the mitigating factor to cheap shots, etc., as a deterrent. The problem is getting that objectivity going and having it be enforced thoroughly even for actions that don't directly lead to injuries. Without that it's impossible to make fighting illegal.
- WarriorOfGandhi
- Registered Broad
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 1:47 am
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
WarriorOfGandhi wrote:I'd rather watch hockey without goons than hockey without fighting
That requires no fighting. There's a reason why someone like John Scott or Patrick Bordeleau is in the NHL. Not to say they aren't good hockey players -- even if you're an AHLer at best, you're a fucking great one -- but relative to their peers it's pretty obvious why they make the cut while someone like, say, Van Der Gulik may not.
- WarriorOfGandhi
- Registered Broad
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 1:47 am
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
NHL33 wrote:That requires no fighting. There's a reason why someone like John Scott or Patrick Bordeleau is in the NHL. Not to say they aren't good hockey players -- even if you're an AHLer at best, you're a fucking great one -- but relative to their peers it's pretty obvious why they make the cut while someone like, say, Van Der Gulik may not.
let's not kid ourselves, Bordeleau is not in the NHL due to his hockey talents. He's on Colorado's roster because he's willing to take some other dude's fist to his cranium. So are Parros, Orr, Sestito, Dorsett, Reaves, etc. The margin between them and a top-line AHL producer may not be much, but it's definitive, just like the margin between, say, Crosby and Ribeiro.
VDG will never be confused with a good, or even an average NHLer, but he managed to produce nearly 50% more in 46 career games than Bordeleau has in 71. That's worth more than a thousand fights and a thousand theoretical momentum swings in my book.
- WarriorOfGandhi
- Registered Broad
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 1:47 am
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
- Alex Jones
- Posts: 2067
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:48 pm
- Location: University of California-Boulder
I like fighting, just because I think that it's entertaining to watch.
But I don't pretend like it really does anything to deter illegal hits. Or somehow magically swing the momentum of a game. Or provide anything other than bloodsport entertainment. I like it because sometimes it's fun to watch two grown men beat the living shit out each other over virtually nothing.
The only deterrence in the league should be the possibility of league action, not the theoretical threat of a potential fight against someone who may or may not be tougher than you that you may or may not beat up anyway.
But I don't pretend like it really does anything to deter illegal hits. Or somehow magically swing the momentum of a game. Or provide anything other than bloodsport entertainment. I like it because sometimes it's fun to watch two grown men beat the living shit out each other over virtually nothing.
The only deterrence in the league should be the possibility of league action, not the theoretical threat of a potential fight against someone who may or may not be tougher than you that you may or may not beat up anyway.
- MP
- Registered Broad
- Posts: 29041
- Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 1:13 pm
- Location: :uoıʇɐɔoן
- Has given rep: 166 times
- Received rep: 459 times
I like in game fighting due to the game's intensity or reactionary to some action, but dislike guys skating around trying to start a fight or staged fighting off the face off.
Both of which should lead to a game ejection, a 5 min instigator penalty, and lengthy suspension at the refs discretion. Then remove the current instigator rule.
Both of which should lead to a game ejection, a 5 min instigator penalty, and lengthy suspension at the refs discretion. Then remove the current instigator rule.
- ABasin
- Posts: 3324
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 12:59 am
Masterplan wrote:I like in game fighting due to the game's intensity or reactionary to some action, but dislike guys skating around trying to start a fight or staged fighting off the face off.
Agreed completely.
The two heavyweights staging a fight at a faceoff is particularly silly, IMO. It serves no purpose.
WarriorOfGandhi wrote:let's not kid ourselves, Bordeleau is not in the NHL due to his hockey talents. He's on Colorado's roster because he's willing to take some other dude's fist to his cranium. So are Parros, Orr, Sestito, Dorsett, Reaves, etc. The margin between them and a top-line AHL producer may not be much, but it's definitive, just like the margin between, say, Crosby and Ribeiro.
VDG will never be confused with a good, or even an average NHLer, but he managed to produce nearly 50% more in 46 career games than Bordeleau has in 71. That's worth more than a thousand fights and a thousand theoretical momentum swings in my book.
I don't disagree with any of that nor was implying otherwise.
- WarriorOfGandhi
- Registered Broad
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 1:47 am
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
- WarriorOfGandhi
- Registered Broad
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 1:47 am
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
- pedrospecialk
- Registered Broad
- Posts: 2110
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 11:45 pm
- Received rep: 1 time
Return to “2001 Stanley Cup Champion Colorado Avalanche”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests