Craig wrote:Dr. Doom wrote:still think anything removed has to have trump's name on it. i can't think of any scenario where they'd either cover it up or it would be so sensitive they would need extra protection.
Why would Trump have to hide a cash transaction to his own layer? He could just pay him the regular way.
i would assume shady money to the lawyer, lawyer gives shady money to something that connects to trump. did it specifically say it was a SAR's for something going into the account and not out? i'd assume both transactions would trigger a SAR.