OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

The Tendoncy to Retire is Natural
CantSeeColors
Registered Broad
Posts: 4850
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 10:44 am
Has given rep: 53 times
Received rep: 34 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6301 by CantSeeColors » Thu Aug 09, 2018 11:20 am

Yeah, I still hate losing the time to the commute even though I'm working 2-3 days a week from home now. It's so freeing to get that time back.
User avatar
DeadPhish
Registered Broad
Posts: 4142
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 10:14 pm
Has given rep: 24 times
Received rep: 33 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6302 by DeadPhish » Thu Aug 09, 2018 12:12 pm

I usually work 2 days a week at home as well. I can't really complain too much about a commute though, even when I go into the office, it takes me 10 minutes.
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 17604
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 119 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6303 by jester » Fri Aug 10, 2018 12:01 pm

CantSeeColors wrote:Yeah, I still hate losing the time to the commute even though I'm working 2-3 days a week from home now. It's so freeing to get that time back.


When my twerps are more fully formed beings, commuting will lose its appeal quickly.
User avatar
Hovercraft
Registered Broad
Posts: 8489
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 5:59 pm
Location: Newfoundland
Has given rep: 31 times
Received rep: 35 times
Contact:

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6304 by Hovercraft » Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:26 pm

It blows my mind that 50% of the US votes for the GOP. The corruption and hypocrasy is insane.
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 17604
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 119 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6305 by jester » Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:14 am

Hovercraft wrote:It blows my mind that 50% of the US votes for the GOP. The corruption and hypocrasy is insane.


In fairness to us, it's less than half ... which is a bit of a problem, given that this means we are in a minority rule situation.

In fairness to those voters, the Dems have not been a particularly effective party in trying to win their votes.

What should be alarming to all of us, is that the political/cultural divisions in the US are becoming increasingly stark and geographic in nature (urban v. rural, coasts v. middle/south). I am not on the "we are on the verge of another Civil War" train, but I do think we are going to struggle with this in the short-to-medium term. For the global community, that's no small problem given the economic and military capacity of the US.

In the immediate context of the moment, it's pretty remarkable the long-term damage the GOP is willing to do to SCOTUS for a short-term win. If Kavanaugh gave two shits about SCOTUS as an institution, he'd withdraw just to shield it from the damage his potential confirmation will do to it ... particularly with the already deeply problematic Gorsuch already seated.
User avatar
Craig
Registered Broad
Posts: 40004
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:33 pm
Location: Toronto
Has given rep: 44 times
Received rep: 486 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6306 by Craig » Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:25 am

Don't forget Clarence Thomas, who is like Kavanaugh lite.
User avatar
Craig
Registered Broad
Posts: 40004
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:33 pm
Location: Toronto
Has given rep: 44 times
Received rep: 486 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6307 by Craig » Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:33 am

The court is a little terrifying, because outside of the considerations of how bad Kavanaugh is and how illegitimately they got Gorsuch on there, the two oldest justices on the court are both Left leaning. That means if they leave while Trump is in office, there's a real chance that not only will the courts shift to the right, they'll shift so far to the right that the deciding vote on issues will be either Gorsuch or Alito. That's fucking mental.
User avatar
Hovercraft
Registered Broad
Posts: 8489
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 5:59 pm
Location: Newfoundland
Has given rep: 31 times
Received rep: 35 times
Contact:

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6308 by Hovercraft » Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:53 am

Kavanaugh was lying through his teeth under oath and throwing a juvenile hissy fit. And somehow he's still fit for the SCOTUS? Regardless of whether the allegations are true or not (pretty clear that at least Ford's are though. July 1 1982 on his calendar...) he is clearly not fit for a lifetime appointment of such importance.

He swore to God though, so it's all good for the GOP base. As long as we don't all end up in the devils triangle....

If he gets confirmed and then Dems take senate in November, is there anything they can do to reverse it?
User avatar
FlyHigh
Registered Broad
Posts: 4928
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:48 am
Has given rep: 5 times
Received rep: 22 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6309 by FlyHigh » Fri Sep 28, 2018 11:16 am

Nope, if the Dems do take control though in 2020, I'd be in favor of packing the Court at that point; time for extreme measures has come and this is starting to get worse than anything FDR dealt with (on the domestic political front at least), if we hit another depression, shit will really hit the fan.

In 15-20 years (e.g. once most of the boomers are dead), Republicans could struggle to poll at 40% if they keep going down this route, but as long as they can gerrymander and as long as ~20% of the population controls half the Senate, they'll still be in a position to keep screwing everyone over.

Gives me hope that a lot of friends are at least still having kids. Gf and I had a heart-to-heart a few months after the election and decided against it (clock is ticking for her). I'm generally indifferent (which would probably not be great for a father) and she'd been leaning against it and the election cemented it. We're both on the pessimistic side, but man, sometimes it's difficult to see how we make it to 2100 if things keep on like this. Glad that people seem to disagree.
User avatar
Hovercraft
Registered Broad
Posts: 8489
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 5:59 pm
Location: Newfoundland
Has given rep: 31 times
Received rep: 35 times
Contact:

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6310 by Hovercraft » Fri Sep 28, 2018 11:30 am

My wife and I are on the pessimistic side about having children as well, even as Canadians. The world is a crazy place and we are destroying the environment("EPA"). It's hard to be hopeful while we are in this Trump era that still feels like some sort of sick Black Mirror/1984 dystopian/fascist joke.
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 17604
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 119 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6311 by jester » Fri Sep 28, 2018 11:39 am

Craig wrote:Don't forget Clarence Thomas, who is like Kavanaugh lite.


Sure, but that's a 20 year old fight ... doesn't have the immediacy obviously. A far more problematic event between Thomas and today was the Court's involvement in Bush v. Gore.
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 17604
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 119 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6312 by jester » Fri Sep 28, 2018 11:41 am

FlyHigh wrote:Nope, if the Dems do take control though in 2020, I'd be in favor of packing the Court at that point; time for extreme measures has come and this is starting to get worse than anything FDR dealt with (on the domestic political front at least), if we hit another depression, shit will really hit the fan.

In 15-20 years (e.g. once most of the boomers are dead), Republicans could struggle to poll at 40% if they keep going down this route, but as long as they can gerrymander and as long as ~20% of the population controls half the Senate, they'll still be in a position to keep screwing everyone over.

Gives me hope that a lot of friends are at least still having kids. Gf and I had a heart-to-heart a few months after the election and decided against it (clock is ticking for her). I'm generally indifferent (which would probably not be great for a father) and she'd been leaning against it and the election cemented it. We're both on the pessimistic side, but man, sometimes it's difficult to see how we make it to 2100 if things keep on like this. Glad that people seem to disagree.


The generational shift is likely to come sooner than that ... millenials are the largest generation in US history, and also the most diverse. Every year the electorate is going to change substantially as they turn 18. The key: getting them to fucking vote.
User avatar
FlyHigh
Registered Broad
Posts: 4928
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:48 am
Has given rep: 5 times
Received rep: 22 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6313 by FlyHigh » Fri Sep 28, 2018 3:23 pm

Hope you are right jester, I've been wondering when the shift is going to happen, would have thought it started more effectively 5ish years ago, but as you say, getting under-40s to vote is the key thing.
User avatar
Rogers Pancreas
Posts: 10664
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:00 am
Location: New York
Has given rep: 44 times
Received rep: 94 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6314 by Rogers Pancreas » Fri Sep 28, 2018 8:27 pm

Is it okay to post a woman's nipples on the internet if it's art, or do I need to photoshop in Ricky Gervais' instead?

Fuck it.

His Satanic Majestic Request
User avatar
Rogers Pancreas
Posts: 10664
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:00 am
Location: New York
Has given rep: 44 times
Received rep: 94 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6315 by Rogers Pancreas » Thu Oct 25, 2018 6:26 pm

Trump's the saddest, weakest excuse for a human being I have ever seen at any level of government. Including Nixon.

Fuck him, and fuck his lying, raping, murderous lackeys/constituents.
His Satanic Majestic Request
User avatar
Konecny HypeTrain Captain
Registered Broad
Posts: 7617
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:43 pm
Has given rep: 37 times
Received rep: 60 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6316 by Konecny HypeTrain Captain » Thu Oct 25, 2018 11:08 pm

What's worse? Him or those who think he's actually doing a stand up job in office?
User avatar
FlyHigh
Registered Broad
Posts: 4928
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:48 am
Has given rep: 5 times
Received rep: 22 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6317 by FlyHigh » Fri Oct 26, 2018 9:52 am

I'm a big believer that politicians tend to just be reflections of their constituents. I think it's easy for people to see their least desirable traits and impulses reflected in politicians and blame politicians, but ultimately, he wouldn't be in office and wouldn't be behaving like this if his constituents and the Republican Party didn't allow him to.

So yeah, they're all reprehensible. One of the depressing aspects of the past couple of years is that it's becoming very clear that 35-40% of the country is actively opposed to the social progress that's occurred in this country generally since the civil rights movement and refuses to acknowledge that there's still a long way to go.
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 17604
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 119 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6318 by jester » Fri Oct 26, 2018 10:08 am

FlyHigh wrote:I'm a big believer that politicians tend to just be reflections of their constituents. I think it's easy for people to see their least desirable traits and impulses reflected in politicians and blame politicians, but ultimately, he wouldn't be in office and wouldn't be behaving like this if his constituents and the Republican Party didn't allow him to.

So yeah, they're all reprehensible. One of the depressing aspects of the past couple of years is that it's becoming very clear that 35-40% of the country is actively opposed to the social progress that's occurred in this country generally since the civil rights movement and refuses to acknowledge that there's still a long way to go.


One caveat: they are representative of the population that votes ... (About 40% of the population didn't vote in 2016, and it is significantly lower in non-presidential years).

And, to an extent, it gets more complicated since so many people that do vote, have no fucking clue what is going on because they barely pay attention--and/or in the modern world, get a lot of bad information from social media and all the rest.

But I agree with the overarching point ... you get the government/politicians you deserve, ultimately. If we had 100% turnout--particularly if young voters turned out in higher numbers--it would transform our politics.
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 17604
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 119 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6319 by jester » Fri Oct 26, 2018 10:09 am

Konecny HypeTrain Captain wrote:What's worse? Him or those who think he's actually doing a stand up job in office?


Him ... but largely because he has actual power.
User avatar
Hovercraft
Registered Broad
Posts: 8489
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 5:59 pm
Location: Newfoundland
Has given rep: 31 times
Received rep: 35 times
Contact:

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6320 by Hovercraft » Fri Oct 26, 2018 10:31 am

The lack of concern about these bombs from the White House and repubs is so scary.
User avatar
DeadPhish
Registered Broad
Posts: 4142
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 10:14 pm
Has given rep: 24 times
Received rep: 33 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6321 by DeadPhish » Fri Oct 26, 2018 12:11 pm

Hovercraft wrote:The lack of concern about these bombs from the White House and repubs is so scary.


It's CNNs fault.
User avatar
DeadPhish
Registered Broad
Posts: 4142
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 10:14 pm
Has given rep: 24 times
Received rep: 33 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6322 by DeadPhish » Fri Oct 26, 2018 12:13 pm

And this morning, he is more concerned that he just lost alot of fake bot followers to his Twitter account, than the bombs.


An American President is complaining that he lost Twitter followers. It's unbelievable that i just typed that sentence.
User avatar
Rogers Pancreas
Posts: 10664
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:00 am
Location: New York
Has given rep: 44 times
Received rep: 94 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6323 by Rogers Pancreas » Fri Oct 26, 2018 12:25 pm

They're not bombs, Hover. They're "Bombs". Get your grammer wright.
His Satanic Majestic Request
User avatar
FlyHigh
Registered Broad
Posts: 4928
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:48 am
Has given rep: 5 times
Received rep: 22 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6324 by FlyHigh » Fri Oct 26, 2018 3:21 pm

jester wrote:
FlyHigh wrote:I'm a big believer that politicians tend to just be reflections of their constituents. I think it's easy for people to see their least desirable traits and impulses reflected in politicians and blame politicians, but ultimately, he wouldn't be in office and wouldn't be behaving like this if his constituents and the Republican Party didn't allow him to.

So yeah, they're all reprehensible. One of the depressing aspects of the past couple of years is that it's becoming very clear that 35-40% of the country is actively opposed to the social progress that's occurred in this country generally since the civil rights movement and refuses to acknowledge that there's still a long way to go.


One caveat: they are representative of the population that votes ... (About 40% of the population didn't vote in 2016, and it is significantly lower in non-presidential years).

And, to an extent, it gets more complicated since so many people that do vote, have no fucking clue what is going on because they barely pay attention--and/or in the modern world, get a lot of bad information from social media and all the rest.

But I agree with the overarching point ... you get the government/politicians you deserve, ultimately. If we had 100% turnout--particularly if young voters turned out in higher numbers--it would transform our politics.


Yeah fair points all. I do have some hope this year that Dem turnout is going to be larger-than-predicted, the turnout they received in some of the special elections blew away expectations, I'm not sure why that optimism has disappeared now. Also kind of hope that Trump's election is a transformative moment for our generation and that we actually start showing up in larger numbers.

Have to say, I was a bit of a skeptic on the Fox News impact for a while and that ppl who watched Fox were already set in their ways, but it seems like a lot of this folks are unmoored from reality and you start to wonder how much of a role Fox plays in that.
User avatar
DeadPhish
Registered Broad
Posts: 4142
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 10:14 pm
Has given rep: 24 times
Received rep: 33 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6325 by DeadPhish » Fri Oct 26, 2018 5:31 pm

I have a few friends at work who are big on Fox News. Both of them have no perception that its skewed far to the left. They think Hannity isn't biased and is "Fair and Balanced." I get that you are going to watch the network you align more with. But when I watch Rachael Maddow, I know shes far left leaning. The dangerous thing, is alot of these folks dont understand this for what they watch..
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 17604
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 119 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6326 by jester » Fri Oct 26, 2018 5:47 pm

DeadPhish wrote:I have a few friends at work who are big on Fox News. Both of them have no perception that its skewed far to the left. They think Hannity isn't biased and is "Fair and Balanced." I get that you are going to watch the network you align more with. But when I watch Rachael Maddow, I know shes far left leaning. The dangerous thing, is alot of these folks dont understand this for what they watch..


The big difference between Fox and MSNBC is that MSNBC overall has ideological bent (given who they employ, it isn't nearly as liberal as people imagine). Fox, on the other hand, is ultimately a party organ. Nothing demonstrates this more than their shift from anti-Trump to being his biggest booster when it became apparent he was winning the primary.
User avatar
Craig
Registered Broad
Posts: 40004
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:33 pm
Location: Toronto
Has given rep: 44 times
Received rep: 486 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6327 by Craig » Fri Oct 26, 2018 6:26 pm

MSNBC provides a leftist take on events. Fox provides alternative events.
User avatar
vonbonds
Registered Broad
Posts: 14366
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:47 pm
Has given rep: 1894 times
Received rep: 845 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6328 by vonbonds » Fri Oct 26, 2018 6:38 pm

NPR and PBS for me. I know they’re considered liberal but I feel like they try the most of all the broadcast stations to show more than one side to key issues.
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 17604
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 119 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6329 by jester » Fri Oct 26, 2018 6:40 pm

vonbonds wrote:NPR and PBS for me. I know they’re considered liberal but I feel like they try the most of all the broadcast stations to show more than one side to key issues.


CNN tries very hard ... and it results in absurdities like Jeffrey Lord getting a regular gig on air.
User avatar
vonbonds
Registered Broad
Posts: 14366
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:47 pm
Has given rep: 1894 times
Received rep: 845 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6330 by vonbonds » Sat Oct 27, 2018 5:15 pm

jester wrote:
vonbonds wrote:NPR and PBS for me. I know they’re considered liberal but I feel like they try the most of all the broadcast stations to show more than one side to key issues.


CNN tries very hard ... and it results in absurdities like Jeffrey Lord getting a regular gig on air.

BREAKING NEWS CNN?

I hate that constant banner at the bottom with 24/7 breaking news.
User avatar
Rogers Pancreas
Posts: 10664
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:00 am
Location: New York
Has given rep: 44 times
Received rep: 94 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6331 by Rogers Pancreas » Mon Oct 29, 2018 4:09 pm

In other news, middle-aged, disgruntled white guy does something irrational; everyone except him suffers.


More to come. I mean, more to follow.
His Satanic Majestic Request
User avatar
Rogers Pancreas
Posts: 10664
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:00 am
Location: New York
Has given rep: 44 times
Received rep: 94 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6332 by Rogers Pancreas » Sun Nov 04, 2018 5:23 pm

Fun fact: You could watch 120 Days of Sodom every Sunday morning with your family for 18 years, and still come away with less emotional scarring than most ardent Bills' fans exhibit.
His Satanic Majestic Request
User avatar
Rogers Pancreas
Posts: 10664
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:00 am
Location: New York
Has given rep: 44 times
Received rep: 94 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6333 by Rogers Pancreas » Sat Nov 17, 2018 11:18 am

Grant Morrison references "Rex 84" in The Invisibles (Book Two). I do a bit of looking around, and it reads like just another conspiracy theory. Then, I find this:



So, I feel compelled to ask those who seem pretty well versed in politics, and history. Was the Rex 84 a legitimate initiative put forth by Reagan, and his administration?
His Satanic Majestic Request
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 17604
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 119 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6334 by jester » Sun Dec 02, 2018 10:17 am

So, I'm Facebook friends with an unapologetic Marxist grad student that studies the French Revolution. Unintentional comedy is a pretty constant feature of his feed, cuz he says some whacky shit. My favorite theme is him dunking on political figures he doesn't like for the bad things they did the day they die, and then dismissing folks responding with "really?" So George HW Bush (the savviest foreign policy POTUS since Ike, mind you) is an irredeemable POS, and you're an idiot if you don't dance on his still cooling body.

At the same time ... he lionizes early French revolutionaries--the folks that adopted Terror as a policy and murdered hundreds of thousands--without qualification.

I suspect his Facebook wall will not be an asset when he goes job hunting.
User avatar
vonbonds
Registered Broad
Posts: 14366
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:47 pm
Has given rep: 1894 times
Received rep: 845 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6335 by vonbonds » Sun Dec 02, 2018 11:07 am

He’s going to regret being passed over for all of those French Revolution job opportunities.
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 17604
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 119 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6336 by jester » Sun Dec 02, 2018 11:29 am

vonbonds wrote:He’s going to regret being passed over for all of those French Revolution job opportunities.


Much better field for job opportunities than US history.
User avatar
vonbonds
Registered Broad
Posts: 14366
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:47 pm
Has given rep: 1894 times
Received rep: 845 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6337 by vonbonds » Sun Dec 02, 2018 11:54 am

jester wrote:
vonbonds wrote:He’s going to regret being passed over for all of those French Revolution job opportunities.


Much better field for job opportunities than US history.

My wife was a French language major and women’s studies minor in college. She’s a very educated housewife these days.
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 17604
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 119 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6338 by jester » Sun Dec 02, 2018 11:57 am

vonbonds wrote:
jester wrote:
vonbonds wrote:He’s going to regret being passed over for all of those French Revolution job opportunities.


Much better field for job opportunities than US history.

My wife was a French language major and women’s studies minor in college. She’s a very educated housewife these days.


Lil bit different than a PhD.
User avatar
vonbonds
Registered Broad
Posts: 14366
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:47 pm
Has given rep: 1894 times
Received rep: 845 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6339 by vonbonds » Sun Dec 02, 2018 12:01 pm

jester wrote:
vonbonds wrote:
jester wrote:
Much better field for job opportunities than US history.

My wife was a French language major and women’s studies minor in college. She’s a very educated housewife these days.


Lil bit different than a PhD.

Don’t you stop me from taking pot shots at my wife’s bad choices!

She laughs at it now too. I wish we had a few gap years as mandatory for kids between HS and college.
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 17604
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 119 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6340 by jester » Sun Dec 02, 2018 12:19 pm

vonbonds wrote:
jester wrote:
vonbonds wrote:My wife was a French language major and women’s studies minor in college. She’s a very educated housewife these days.


Lil bit different than a PhD.

Don’t you stop me from taking pot shots at my wife’s bad choices!

She laughs at it now too. I wish we had a few gap years as mandatory for kids between HS and college.


True story, liberal arts majors do just fine over the long haul. The idea that they are unemployable is largely a myth. For example, I guarantee your wife could have gotten a teaching gig if she really wanted to with that degree, or found a role with some biz that needed French language fluency.

Generally speaking, the liberal arts kids are a bit more well rounded and a bit more flexible in what they can do than the STEM kids. (Note: I straddle this given my BS in Com Sci and grad work in history.)
User avatar
vonbonds
Registered Broad
Posts: 14366
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:47 pm
Has given rep: 1894 times
Received rep: 845 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6341 by vonbonds » Sun Dec 02, 2018 12:44 pm

jester wrote:
vonbonds wrote:
jester wrote:
Lil bit different than a PhD.

Don’t you stop me from taking pot shots at my wife’s bad choices!

She laughs at it now too. I wish we had a few gap years as mandatory for kids between HS and college.


True story, liberal arts majors do just fine over the long haul. The idea that they are unemployable is largely a myth. For example, I guarantee your wife could have gotten a teaching gig if she really wanted to with that degree, or found a role with some biz that needed French language fluency.

Generally speaking, the liberal arts kids are a bit more well rounded and a bit more flexible in what they can do than the STEM kids. (Note: I straddle this given my BS in Com Sci and grad work in history.)

She had a job and worked for 10 years at the University of Delaware in a non-educator role. She never made more than $50k though, that was her only issue. We/she decided to be a homemaker after our son was born. I think she’ll be going back to work in 3 years or at least try to once our boy hits middle school.

As far as education and jobs go with automation and robotics really getting into gear I really wonder what the good majors will be when my boy goes to college in 10 years. I’m just assuming STEM all the way as of now.
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 17604
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 119 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6342 by jester » Sun Dec 02, 2018 1:01 pm

vonbonds wrote:
jester wrote:
vonbonds wrote:Don’t you stop me from taking pot shots at my wife’s bad choices!

She laughs at it now too. I wish we had a few gap years as mandatory for kids between HS and college.


True story, liberal arts majors do just fine over the long haul. The idea that they are unemployable is largely a myth. For example, I guarantee your wife could have gotten a teaching gig if she really wanted to with that degree, or found a role with some biz that needed French language fluency.

Generally speaking, the liberal arts kids are a bit more well rounded and a bit more flexible in what they can do than the STEM kids. (Note: I straddle this given my BS in Com Sci and grad work in history.)

She had a job and worked for 10 years at the University of Delaware in a non-educator role. She never made more than $50k though, that was her only issue. We/she decided to be a homemaker after our son was born. I think she’ll be going back to work in 3 years or at least try to once our boy hits middle school.

As far as education and jobs go with automation and robotics really getting into gear I really wonder what the good majors will be when my boy goes to college in 10 years. I’m just assuming STEM all the way as of now.


You don't think robotics and automation is coming for STEM gigs, too? We are on the cusp of the next employment revolution (Agricultural, Industrial, and AI very soon). I doubt anything we do now will survive as is.

But going back to jobs and the liberal arts. Data suggests career earnings are not some pit of despair. The really telling figures are the difference between a bachelor's degree and grad degree as we move into a post-industrial economy.


https://cew.georgetown.edu/cew-reports/ ... egemajors/
User avatar
vonbonds
Registered Broad
Posts: 14366
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:47 pm
Has given rep: 1894 times
Received rep: 845 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6343 by vonbonds » Sun Dec 02, 2018 1:32 pm

jester wrote:
vonbonds wrote:
jester wrote:
True story, liberal arts majors do just fine over the long haul. The idea that they are unemployable is largely a myth. For example, I guarantee your wife could have gotten a teaching gig if she really wanted to with that degree, or found a role with some biz that needed French language fluency.

Generally speaking, the liberal arts kids are a bit more well rounded and a bit more flexible in what they can do than the STEM kids. (Note: I straddle this given my BS in Com Sci and grad work in history.)

She had a job and worked for 10 years at the University of Delaware in a non-educator role. She never made more than $50k though, that was her only issue. We/she decided to be a homemaker after our son was born. I think she’ll be going back to work in 3 years or at least try to once our boy hits middle school.

As far as education and jobs go with automation and robotics really getting into gear I really wonder what the good majors will be when my boy goes to college in 10 years. I’m just assuming STEM all the way as of now.


You don't think robotics and automation is coming for STEM gigs, too? We are on the cusp of the next employment revolution (Agricultural, Industrial, and AI very soon). I doubt anything we do now will survive as is.

But going back to jobs and the liberal arts. Data suggests career earnings are not some pit of despair. The really telling figures are the difference between a bachelor's degree and grad degree as we move into a post-industrial economy.


https://cew.georgetown.edu/cew-reports/ ... egemajors/

Cool link. I’ll dig into that later. Thanks
CantSeeColors
Registered Broad
Posts: 4850
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 10:44 am
Has given rep: 53 times
Received rep: 34 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6344 by CantSeeColors » Sun Dec 02, 2018 6:43 pm

vonbonds wrote:
jester wrote:
vonbonds wrote:My wife was a French language major and women’s studies minor in college. She’s a very educated housewife these days.


Lil bit different than a PhD.

Don’t you stop me from taking pot shots at my wife’s bad choices!

She laughs at it now too. I wish we had a few gap years as mandatory for kids between HS and college.

I intend to fully support my kid(s) if he/they decide to take a year or two off to figure themselves out
User avatar
Rogers Pancreas
Posts: 10664
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:00 am
Location: New York
Has given rep: 44 times
Received rep: 94 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6345 by Rogers Pancreas » Sun Dec 02, 2018 6:53 pm

vonbonds wrote:
jester wrote:
vonbonds wrote:Don’t you stop me from taking pot shots at my wife’s bad choices!

She laughs at it now too. I wish we had a few gap years as mandatory for kids between HS and college.


True story, liberal arts majors do just fine over the long haul. The idea that they are unemployable is largely a myth. For example, I guarantee your wife could have gotten a teaching gig if she really wanted to with that degree, or found a role with some biz that needed French language fluency.

Generally speaking, the liberal arts kids are a bit more well rounded and a bit more flexible in what they can do than the STEM kids. (Note: I straddle this given my BS in Com Sci and grad work in history.)

She had a job and worked for 10 years at the University of Delaware in a non-educator role. She never made more than $50k though, that was her only issue. We/she decided to be a homemaker after our son was born. I think she’ll be going back to work in 3 years or at least try to once our boy hits middle school.

As far as education and jobs go with automation and robotics really getting into gear I really wonder what the good majors will be when my boy goes to college in 10 years. I’m just assuming STEM all the way as of now.

Tell your kids to find what makes them happy, and pursue it with everything they have.
His Satanic Majestic Request
User avatar
JLHockeyKnight
Registered Broad
Posts: 6597
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 5:02 pm
Location: Central Jersey
Has given rep: 90 times
Received rep: 36 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6346 by JLHockeyKnight » Sun Dec 02, 2018 9:24 pm

jester wrote:So, I'm Facebook friends with an unapologetic Marxist grad student that studies the French Revolution. Unintentional comedy is a pretty constant feature of his feed, cuz he says some whacky shit. My favorite theme is him dunking on political figures he doesn't like for the bad things they did the day they die, and then dismissing folks responding with "really?" So George HW Bush (the savviest foreign policy POTUS since Ike, mind you) is an irredeemable POS, and you're an idiot if you don't dance on his still cooling body.

At the same time ... he lionizes early French revolutionaries--the folks that adopted Terror as a policy and murdered hundreds of thousands--without qualification.

I suspect his Facebook wall will not be an asset when he goes job hunting.


I know who his Facebook wall is an asset to. And those folks are the FBI.
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 17604
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 119 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6347 by jester » Mon Dec 03, 2018 9:53 am

CantSeeColors wrote:I intend to fully support my kid(s) if he/they decide to take a year or two off to figure themselves out


Yeah, I think gap years should be more popular as long as they are used constructively. If my kids want to go do City Year, work an internship somewhere, or whatever, I'm all for that. Taught way too many kids that were uninterested and/or not ready for higher ed.
User avatar
Rogers Pancreas
Posts: 10664
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:00 am
Location: New York
Has given rep: 44 times
Received rep: 94 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6348 by Rogers Pancreas » Fri Dec 14, 2018 12:43 pm

I'm only casually paying attention to the news these days, but it seems like the smoke clouds around the White House are getting thicker and darker by the week.

Knowing that Mike Pence is the VP, is it likely Trump finds himself impeached prior to the next election - leaving the Republicans with a mess on their hands as they're trying to prepare for re-elections, and Pence with zero time on the doomsday clock to do anything damaging?
His Satanic Majestic Request
User avatar
DeadPhish
Registered Broad
Posts: 4142
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 10:14 pm
Has given rep: 24 times
Received rep: 33 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6349 by DeadPhish » Fri Dec 14, 2018 4:14 pm

If he gets impeached, I don't see the Senate convicting him. Would take way too many Republicans to get on board. Unless everyone is on board for supporting Pence in a re-election bid.
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 17604
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 119 times

Re: OT Thread, NOT Obsequious 2

Post #6350 by jester » Sun Dec 16, 2018 8:30 am

As of now, impeachment seems increasingly likely (probably up to 50/50 now), but the GOP is a long way off from convicting him in the Senate, for sure. That may shift depending on a) how damaging the Mueller report is; b) the degree to which the GOP base believes the Mueller report.

Wild card(s): Trump might go totally off the rails if his kids get indicted, and he already faces likely indictment in the SDNY if he loses reelection. So, does he resign and get a pardon from Pence?

Return to “The Eric Wellwood Memorial”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests