Murrica: fuck yeah

..et d'autres discussions ennuyeuses
User avatar
chicpea
Registered Broad
Posts: 6433
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:09 pm
Location: lagoons or ditches
Has given rep: 732 times
Received rep: 467 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9151 by chicpea » Fri Aug 10, 2018 12:18 pm

We may have an N Tape in addition to the P Tape.
User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 9280
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 151 times
Received rep: 471 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9152 by Dr_Chimera » Fri Aug 10, 2018 1:15 pm

senate
Registered Broad
Posts: 10656
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:36 am
Has given rep: 259 times
Received rep: 465 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9153 by senate » Fri Aug 10, 2018 1:22 pm



chicpea wrote:We may have an N Tape in addition to the P Tape.


Before the election, Tom Arnold implied that there a mountain of cut footage from The Apprentice of Trump saying racist slurs, but the production company was NDAed from releasing it and the crew and contestants were NDAed from talking about it.
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 7072
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 134 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9154 by jester » Fri Aug 10, 2018 2:34 pm

Dog wrote:Recall it being widely reported (around the time of the access holywood tape) that there was a ton of Apprendice tapes with Trump being mental, but the NDAs had very stiff penalties (like tens of millions). No tapes were ever released.

I doubt this girl has any tapes. Probably just referring to those same tapes that won’t be leaked (as they haven’t until now). She just peddling her book.


I am SHOCKED you wouldn't take Omarosa at her word ...

I get where they're coming from with not wanting to release that footage, as it would hurt business going forward. That being said, there's some shady financial dealings involving Burnett that occurred after the election.
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 7072
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 134 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9155 by jester » Fri Aug 10, 2018 4:55 pm

Dog wrote:In any event, it’s not like anybody would learn anything new by hearing Trump being a loudmouth racist/sexist. Everybody knows. Some mind, some don’t care, some rejoice.


I tend to agree the needle wouldn't move too much
... but to an extent it depends on the audio. If it's Trump just casually throwing around the n-word, I doubt there would be a huge impact. On the other hand, if it's Trump unequivocally saying racist shit and throwing it around, I suspect it would move a sliver of voters.

It seems to me that one of the defensive barriers against the "Trump is racist" accusation is that his (non-racist) defenders have a narrow understanding of racism. It needs to be really explicit before they'll grasp it.

I doubt we will ever hear that audio, though. Much more likely a Dem Congress will produce his tax returns.
User avatar
mayoradamwest
Registered Broad
Posts: 10412
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:38 pm
Has given rep: 366 times
Received rep: 202 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9156 by mayoradamwest » Fri Aug 10, 2018 9:47 pm

Let's not try and apply logic here folks
User avatar
Shawnathan Horcoff
Registered Broad
Posts: 17014
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 7:51 am
Has given rep: 542 times
Received rep: 708 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9157 by Shawnathan Horcoff » Fri Aug 10, 2018 10:21 pm

mayoradamwest wrote:Let's not try and apply logic here folks


The last man on Earth will still be assuring himself that humans couldn’t afford to deal with a changing society or climate. Image
Also, let's keep this thread about Galchenyuk's on-ice performance, development and value and NOT bring in his personal life or race.
User avatar
Slick Nick
Registered Broad
Posts: 7016
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:40 pm
Has given rep: 907 times
Received rep: 568 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9158 by Slick Nick » Sat Aug 11, 2018 12:49 am

jester wrote:It needs to be really explicit before they'll grasp it.


You mean like these?

Image
User avatar
mayoradamwest
Registered Broad
Posts: 10412
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:38 pm
Has given rep: 366 times
Received rep: 202 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9159 by mayoradamwest » Sat Aug 11, 2018 9:17 am

Man, not professional Twitter name too! :(
User avatar
shredz
Registered Broad
Posts: 33662
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 3:31 pm
Location: Rock Bottom, NY
Has given rep: 2014 times
Received rep: 1003 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9160 by shredz » Sat Aug 11, 2018 12:47 pm

User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 7072
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 134 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9161 by jester » Sat Aug 11, 2018 12:57 pm

Slick Nick wrote:
jester wrote:It needs to be really explicit before they'll grasp it.


You mean like these?

Image


No, not parody/critique, actual racism. But I like you pushing the alt-right BS machine here. I mean, any time you can line yourself up with these assholes and the Gamergate crowd, ya gotta do it, right?
User avatar
Slick Nick
Registered Broad
Posts: 7016
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:40 pm
Has given rep: 907 times
Received rep: 568 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9162 by Slick Nick » Sat Aug 11, 2018 3:04 pm

What exactly does posting fuck white people accomplish? Do you think it actually helps solving racism? Or is it the cool thing you now do to show how progressed you are?
User avatar
chicpea
Registered Broad
Posts: 6433
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:09 pm
Location: lagoons or ditches
Has given rep: 732 times
Received rep: 467 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9163 by chicpea » Sat Aug 11, 2018 3:54 pm

The money trail, made public here for the first time, sheds new light on [Republican Peter]Smith’s effort, in which he told people he was in touch with both Russians on the dark web and Trump campaign officials — particularly Michael Flynn, who was then a top adviser to the Trump campaign and later served as national security adviser before having to resign after misleading White House officials about his meetings with the Russian ambassador to the United States.


https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ja ... lynn-money

and listen in on lawfare's take here: http://traffic.libsyn.com/lawfare/Cormi ... -id=221919
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 7072
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 134 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9164 by jester » Sat Aug 11, 2018 4:34 pm

Slick Nick wrote:What exactly does posting fuck white people accomplish? Do you think it actually helps solving racism? Or is it the cool thing you now do to show how progressed you are?


Why do you assume she was trying to "solve" racism. Look, I'm going to go out on a limb and assume that a) you're not new to the internet; b) have some awareness of internet culture; and c) have the ability to imagine the context surrounding an *Asian woman* covering the tech environment along with her social media presence. I'm also going to assume you understand the tactic of surfacing old social media postings and presenting them in a bad faith manner ...

Of course, as said, either you're cool with your allies on this one (literally the toxic cesspool of internet culture) or you're not. If you are, it is what it is ... alt-right and Gamergate d-bags serm like fun at parties. If you're not cool with that crowd (and what they're doing there), may need to think harder about the argument being made and *why* it is being made.
User avatar
Slick Nick
Registered Broad
Posts: 7016
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:40 pm
Has given rep: 907 times
Received rep: 568 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9165 by Slick Nick » Sat Aug 11, 2018 5:46 pm

jester wrote:
Slick Nick wrote:What exactly does posting fuck white people accomplish? Do you think it actually helps solving racism? Or is it the cool thing you now do to show how progressed you are?


Why do you assume she was trying to "solve" racism. Look, I'm going to go out on a limb and assume that a) you're not new to the internet; b) have some awareness of internet culture; and c) have the ability to imagine the context surrounding an *Asian woman* covering the tech environment along with her social media presence. I'm also going to assume you understand the tactic of surfacing old social media postings and presenting them in a bad faith manner ...

Of course, as said, either you're cool with your allies on this one (literally the toxic cesspool of internet culture) or you're not. If you are, it is what it is ... alt-right and Gamergate d-bags serm like fun at parties. If you're not cool with that crowd (and what they're doing there), may need to think harder about the argument being made and *why* it is being made.


I'm of the opinion that the left's propensity to racialise every aspect of life is only making things worse in the long run. And garbage like this should offend you as much as any racist garbage you hear from the fart-right, but somehow it doesn't and you even seem to caution this attitude.
User avatar
PredsFan77
Posts: 16758
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:53 am
Location: 7 TIME LOUNGE JEOPARDY CHAMP!!!
Has given rep: 136 times
Received rep: 463 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9166 by PredsFan77 » Sat Aug 11, 2018 6:08 pm

Just need to do more barrel roles
CDX.NA.IG.9









[LEFT]Image[/LEFT]
User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 9280
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 151 times
Received rep: 471 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9167 by Dr_Chimera » Sat Aug 11, 2018 6:23 pm

I think even completely satire-free bitching about white people is fine in most contexts. How thin-skinned must one be to take offense?

One exception would be a scenario in which most white people die of white people disease and the remaining ones are heckled all the time and forced to shine shoes.
User avatar
Slick Nick
Registered Broad
Posts: 7016
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:40 pm
Has given rep: 907 times
Received rep: 568 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9168 by Slick Nick » Sat Aug 11, 2018 8:09 pm

Dog wrote:Are members of minorities racist? Absolutely, nobody would deny that. If there is more focus on racist acts from the majority, it’s first and foremost because their dominant position makes it much more impactful on the lives of minorities. You know, like the Han Chinese vs muslim minorities in the interior. I mean, I’m sure Muslims can be racist. And, heck, that’s a real issue in the middle east. Slavery is sorta not cool.

You know, context and taking into account broader power dynamics is kinda really important.

And, you know, saying that calling the Trump presidency racist is « racializing everything » is nuts. Dude’s been overtly racist in a sickening way. And it matters cause he’s the president and he’s whipping up racism in the majority against minorities who are already victims of unfair power dynamics and discrimination.

I don’t get it. You claim that french Canadians are victims of centuries of discrimination, that the discrimination still exists and the way to protect themselves is to become a separate country......but you don’t really see how blacks, muslims, hispanics in the US are discriminated against...or think that it makes sense to water down their legitimate grievances by yelling “both sides” all the time. Why won’t anybody stand up for the white mens in murica or the han chinese in China or the sunni in saudi arabia and call out the bullshit of their minorities..

Dude, wtf?


Maybe you should read my posts instead of trying to words in my mouth, dog. When did I ever say that there's no racism against minorities? The only thing I've be saying for months now is that we will never win this battle if we keep making race the center of every discussion. If we don't treat each other as people before people of race and color, we'll always be stuck in that stupid loop. And when I'm talking about racializing everything, I'm talking about cultural appropriation nonsense, evaluating movies not on their content but rather on how many people of color there were in the cast, blaming voting patterns on skin color, etc.

Dog wrote:Are members of minorities racist? Absolutely, nobody would deny that.


From the modern sociological approach, only white people can be racist because racism is prejudice + social power. That's like a dogma on the left nowadays, dog.

Why won’t anybody stand up for the white mens in murica or the han chinese in China or the sunni in saudi arabia and call out the bullshit of their minorities..


It's not about standing up for the white man, it's standing up for a principle.. we either don't accept any racism, or we accept all of it... accepting racism for some groups of people is an utterly aberrant idea in a society that pretends to want to eradicate it.
User avatar
Slick Nick
Registered Broad
Posts: 7016
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:40 pm
Has given rep: 907 times
Received rep: 568 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9169 by Slick Nick » Sat Aug 11, 2018 8:22 pm

Dr_Chimera wrote: How thin-skinned must one be to take offense?


Yeah, I guess I'm thin-skinned because I find it wrong for a public persona to call for the extinction of a whole race.. but those people protesting outside a sushi joint because the owner is of Norwegian decent are the real heroes of modern times, right?
senate
Registered Broad
Posts: 10656
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:36 am
Has given rep: 259 times
Received rep: 465 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9170 by senate » Sat Aug 11, 2018 8:40 pm

User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 9280
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 151 times
Received rep: 471 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9171 by Dr_Chimera » Sat Aug 11, 2018 8:43 pm

Edit: After reading another one of dog's long masterpieces I have decided to stay out of this.
User avatar
PredsFan77
Posts: 16758
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:53 am
Location: 7 TIME LOUNGE JEOPARDY CHAMP!!!
Has given rep: 136 times
Received rep: 463 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9172 by PredsFan77 » Sat Aug 11, 2018 9:32 pm

Y’all just need to steal a plane
CDX.NA.IG.9



















[LEFT]Image[/LEFT]
User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 9280
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 151 times
Received rep: 471 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9173 by Dr_Chimera » Sat Aug 11, 2018 10:30 pm

Is Battlestar Galactica any good? I don't mind the genre of white people being miserable as much as Sarah Jeong.
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 7072
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 134 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9174 by jester » Sat Aug 11, 2018 11:54 pm

Slick Nick wrote:I'm of the opinion that the left's propensity to racialise every aspect of life is only making things worse in the long run. And garbage like this should offend you as much as any racist garbage you hear from the fart-right, but somehow it doesn't and you even seem to caution this attitude.


Points for the false equivalence between an Asian woman popping off on twitter with a bunch of young, white men ... let alone the POTUS spouting racist garbage. Racism is partially language and rhetoric, but it is also very much about power. The far right's rhetoric and actions operate within an environment of privilege, and the hysterics derive from the perceived loss of that privilege. That is *very* different than a minority holding up a mirror and calling out the BS that goes on.

A black man that commits the same crime as a white man in this country is significantly more likely to be executed for that crime. Race is one of the defining features of American political and cultural life. There is no escaping it. It has been a dominant feature of literally every moment of our collective history. Our political, legal, and economic history is inextricably intertwined with racial discrimination. We simply cannot wave a magic wand and say none of that matters. That the historical weight of systemic racism has no effect on the moment. Particularly when one of the major political parties has allowed itself to be the home of racists for decades, and is now empowering them. So, no, I'm going to remain much more offended by the far right's racist garbage. Their racist garbage has justified lynchings, red lining, etc. and POC have every reason to be angry about it.
senate
Registered Broad
Posts: 10656
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:36 am
Has given rep: 259 times
Received rep: 465 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9175 by senate » Sun Aug 12, 2018 12:10 am

Dr_Chimera wrote:Is Battlestar Galactica any good? I don't mind the genre of white people being miserable as much as Sarah Jeong.


The first two seasons are good (with a few clunker episodes); the third season is mediocre; and the last season is bad.

The show-runner was Ronald Moore, who was a writer-producer on DS9, and just like DS9, the show really falls apart whenever it does religion/prophesy/destiny shit. Season 4 is all religion shit.

Also, I don't think the people that Sarah Jeong was trying to troll would consider Edward James Osmos white, but maybe that was part of the troll?
User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 9280
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 151 times
Received rep: 471 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9176 by Dr_Chimera » Sun Aug 12, 2018 1:11 pm

Next time some idiot says "fuck yeah America look at our GDP dude, excellent".

Image
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 7072
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 134 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9177 by jester » Sun Aug 12, 2018 1:19 pm

It's a big problem, with a lot of personal biases at play. For example, my mother in law who thinks it's remarkable to suggest that average Americans do not benefit much from the stock market going up. She thinks that way entirely because they have non-trivial investments, and she doesn't perceive herself as abnormal.
senate
Registered Broad
Posts: 10656
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:36 am
Has given rep: 259 times
Received rep: 465 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9178 by senate » Sun Aug 12, 2018 3:32 pm

Dog wrote:The Doctor is going to scold me again for my long posts.

Twitter banalities >> stream of consciousness long posts.

:why:


Just put random gifs and images in-between paragraphs. People here seem to like that.

Dog wrote:The impact of the cuts, on an already heated economy, was always predicted by almost any serious economist to lead to inflation, accelerated rate hikes and ballooning deficits. It’s a disastrous short term cash grab by corporate america.



US inflation is already at 3% (highest sonce 2012, with core inflation (ex oil and food) at highest since 2008). That’s the reason why wage growth has been flat and is now going negative in real terms. I don’t think most people realize it yet because of ´money illussion’ (ie. people think in nominal, not real money terms). But as inflation persists and continues to rise, the effects of negative real growth in wages will become very perceptive. Workers will be further stretched and demand will fall...in a context of rising rates.




The tax cuts are a myopic short term cash grab. I’m just hoping for continued acceleration of inflation growth, so that this short term unsustainable boom can blow up and consequences be felt and known prior to 2020. Of course, if the Dems take the House, GOP will just blame that (ie. things where great until Dems gained the power to obstruct in congress).

Image
senate
Registered Broad
Posts: 10656
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:36 am
Has given rep: 259 times
Received rep: 465 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9179 by senate » Sun Aug 12, 2018 3:50 pm

Dog wrote:Was that an otter? Can’t see it very well. How big is an otter supposed to be?


I believe that's a weasel.
User avatar
shredz
Registered Broad
Posts: 33662
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 3:31 pm
Location: Rock Bottom, NY
Has given rep: 2014 times
Received rep: 1003 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9180 by shredz » Sun Aug 12, 2018 5:22 pm

Treason Weasel.
User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 9280
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 151 times
Received rep: 471 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9181 by Dr_Chimera » Sun Aug 12, 2018 5:25 pm

Dog wrote:The Doctor is going to scold me again for my long posts.

Twitter banalities >> stream of consciousness long posts.

:why:


All right settle down, Marcel Proust.
User avatar
shredz
Registered Broad
Posts: 33662
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 3:31 pm
Location: Rock Bottom, NY
Has given rep: 2014 times
Received rep: 1003 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9182 by shredz » Sun Aug 12, 2018 5:42 pm

Image
User avatar
shredz
Registered Broad
Posts: 33662
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 3:31 pm
Location: Rock Bottom, NY
Has given rep: 2014 times
Received rep: 1003 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9183 by shredz » Sun Aug 12, 2018 5:59 pm

senate
Registered Broad
Posts: 10656
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:36 am
Has given rep: 259 times
Received rep: 465 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9184 by senate » Sun Aug 12, 2018 6:15 pm

For a long time I used to go to bed early. Sometimes, when I had put out my candle, my eyes would close so quickly that I had not even time to say "The impact of the cuts, on an already heated economy, was always predicted by almost any serious economist to lead to inflation, accelerated rate hikes and ballooning deficits. It’s a disastrous short term cash grab by corporate america. US inflation is already at 3% (highest sonce 2012, with core inflation (ex oil and food) at highest since 2008). That’s the reason why wage growth has been flat and is now going negative in real terms. I don’t think most people realize it yet because of ´money illussion’ (ie. people think in nominal, not real money terms). But as inflation persists and continues to rise, the effects of negative real growth in wages will become very perceptive. Workers will be further stretched and demand will fall...in a context of rising rates. The tax cuts are a myopic short term cash grab. I’m just hoping for continued acceleration of inflation growth, so that this short term unsustainable boom can blow up and consequences be felt and known prior to 2020. Of course, if the Dems take the House, GOP will just blame that (ie. things where great until Dems gained the power to obstruct in congress)." And half an hour later the thought that it was time to go to sleep would awaken me; I would try to put away the book which, I imagined, was still in my hands, and to blow out the light; I had been thinking all the time, while I was asleep, of what I had just been reading, but my thoughts had run into a channel of their own, until I myself seemed actually to have become the subject of my book: a church, a quartet, the rivalry between François I and Charles V. This impression would persist for some moments after I was awake; it did not disturb my mind, but it lay like scales upon my eyes and prevented them from registering the fact that the candle was no longer burning. Then it would begin to seem unintelligible, as the thoughts of a former existence must be to a reincarnate spirit; the subject of my book would separate itself from me, leaving me free to choose whether I would form part of it or no; and at the same time my sight would return and I would be astonished to find myself in a state of darkness, pleasant and restful enough for the eyes, and even more, perhaps, for my mind, to which it appeared incomprehensible, without a cause, a matter dark indeed.

I would ask myself what o'clock it could be; I could hear the whistling of trains, which, now nearer and now farther off, punctuating the distance like the note of a bird in a forest, shewed me in perspective the deserted countryside through which a traveller would be hurrying towards the nearest station: the path that he followed being fixed for ever in his memory by the general excitement due to being in a strange place, to doing unusual things, to the last words of conversation, to farewells exchanged beneath an unfamiliar lamp which echoed still in his ears amid the silence of the night; and to the delightful prospect of being once again at home.

I would lay my cheeks gently against the comfortable cheeks of my pillow, as plump and blooming as the cheeks of babyhood. Or I would strike a match to look at my watch. Nearly midnight. The hour when an invalid, who has been obliged to start on a journey and to sleep in a strange hotel, awakens in a moment of illness and sees with glad relief a streak of daylight shewing under his bedroom door. Oh, joy of joys! it is morning. The servants will be about in a minute: he can ring, and some one will come to look after him. The thought of being made comfortable gives him strength to endure his pain. He is certain he heard footsteps: they come nearer, and then die away. The ray of light beneath his door is extinguished. It is midnight; some one has turned out the gas; the last servant has gone to bed, and he must lie all night in agony with no one to bring him any help.

I would fall asleep, and often I would be awake again for short snatches only, just long enough to hear the regular creaking of the wainscot, or to open my eyes to settle the shifting kaleidoscope of the darkness, to savour, in an instantaneous flash of perception, the sleep which lay heavy upon the furniture, the room, the whole surroundings of which I formed but an insignificant part and whose unconsciousness I should very soon return to share. Or, perhaps, while I was asleep I had returned without the least effort to an earlier stage in my life, now for ever outgrown; and had come under the thrall of one of my childish terrors, such as that old terror of my great-uncle's pulling my curls, which was effectually dispelled on the day—the dawn of a new era to me—on which they were finally cropped from my head. I had forgotten that event during my sleep; I remembered it again immediately I had succeeded in making myself wake up to escape my great-uncle's fingers; still, as a measure of precaution, I would bury the whole of my head in the pillow before returning to the world of dreams.

Sometimes, too, just as Eve was created from a rib of Adam, so a woman would come into existence while I was sleeping, conceived from some strain in the position of my limbs. Formed by the appetite that I was on the point of gratifying, she it was, I imagined, who offered me that gratification. My body, conscious that its own warmth was permeating hers, would strive to become one with her, and I would awake. The rest of humanity seemed very remote in comparison with this woman whose company I had left but a moment ago: my cheek was still warm with her kiss, my body bent beneath the weight of hers. If, as would sometimes happen, she had the appearance of some woman whom I had known in waking hours, I would abandon myself altogether to the sole quest of her, like people who set out on a journey to see with their own eyes some city that they have always longed to visit, and imagine that they can taste in reality what has charmed their fancy. And then, gradually, the memory of her would dissolve and vanish, until I had forgotten the maiden of my dream.

When a man is asleep, he has in a circle round him the chain of the hours, the sequence of the years, the order of the heavenly host. Instinctively, when he awakes, he looks to these, and in an instant reads off his own position on the earth's surface and the amount of time that has elapsed during his slumbers; but this ordered procession is apt to grow confused, and to break its ranks. Suppose that, towards morning, after a night of insomnia, sleep descends upon him while he is reading, in quite a different position from that in which he normally goes to sleep, he has only to lift his arm to arrest the sun and turn it back in its course, and, at the moment of waking, he will have no idea of the time, but will conclude that he has just gone to bed. Or suppose that he gets drowsy in some even more abnormal position; sitting in an armchair, say, after dinner: then the world will fall topsy-turvy from its orbit, the magic chair will carry him at full speed through time and space, and when he opens his eyes again he will imagine that he went to sleep months earlier and in some far distant country. But for me it was enough if, in my own bed, my sleep was so heavy as completely to relax my consciousness; for then I lost all sense of the place in which I had gone to sleep, and when I awoke at midnight, not knowing where I was, I could not be sure at first who I was; I had only the most rudimentary sense of existence, such as may lurk and flicker in the depths of an animal's consciousness; I was more destitute of human qualities than the cave-dweller; but then the memory, not yet of the place in which I was, but of various other places where I had lived, and might now very possibly be, would come like a rope let down from heaven to draw me up out of the abyss of not-being, from which I could never have escaped by myself: in a flash I would traverse and surmount centuries of civilisation, and out of a half-visualised succession of oil-lamps, followed by shirts with turned-down collars, would put together by degrees the component parts of my ego.

Perhaps the immobility of the things that surround us is forced upon them by our conviction that they are themselves, and not anything else, and by the immobility of our conceptions of them. For it always happened that when I awoke like this, and my mind struggled in an unsuccessful attempt to discover where I was, everything would be moving round me through the darkness: things, places, years. My body, still too heavy with sleep to move, would make an effort to construe the form which its tiredness took as an orientation of its various members, so as to induce from that where the wall lay and the furniture stood, to piece together and to give a name to the house in which it must be living. Its memory, the composite memory of its ribs, knees, and shoulder-blades offered it a whole series of rooms in which it had at one time or another slept; while the unseen walls kept changing, adapting themselves to the shape of each successive room that it remembered, whirling madly through the darkness. And even before my brain, lingering in consideration of when things had happened and of what they had looked like, had collected sufficient impressions to enable it to identify the room, it, my body, would recall from each room in succession what the bed was like, where the doors were, how daylight came in at the windows, whether there was a passage outside, what I had had in my mind when I went to sleep, and had found there when I awoke. The stiffened side underneath my body would, for instance, in trying to fix its position, imagine itself to be lying, face to the wall, in a big bed with a canopy; and at once I would say to myself, "Why, I must have gone to sleep after all, and Mamma never came to say good night!" for I was in the country with my grandfather, who died years ago; and my body, the side upon which I was lying, loyally preserving from the past an impression which my mind should never have forgotten, brought back before my eyes the glimmering flame of the night-light in its bowl of Bohemian glass, shaped like an urn and hung by chains from the ceiling, and the chimney-piece of Siena marble in my bedroom at Combray, in my great-aunt's house, in those far distant days which, at the moment of waking, seemed present without being clearly penned, but would become plainer in a little while when I was properly awake.
User avatar
PredsFan77
Posts: 16758
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:53 am
Location: 7 TIME LOUNGE JEOPARDY CHAMP!!!
Has given rep: 136 times
Received rep: 463 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9185 by PredsFan77 » Sun Aug 12, 2018 6:56 pm

tl;dr
CDX.NA.IG.9



















[LEFT]Image[/LEFT]
User avatar
Slick Nick
Registered Broad
Posts: 7016
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:40 pm
Has given rep: 907 times
Received rep: 568 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9186 by Slick Nick » Sun Aug 12, 2018 10:40 pm

Dog wrote:I don’t know, man. We were talking about Trump (the prez of the USA) being racist and race baiting and you come in here making the very valid counterpoint of some random minority on twitter.

Is all racism bad? absolutely. Does that mean that when the prez of the USA makes obcene racist and race baiting comments we shouldn’t call it because, you know, minorities make racist comments on twitter too?

The preponderance of power is important. You can’t just pretend that the acts of the potus and parts of his administration = shit random people say. What that is, Nick, whether you realize it or not is excusing and watering down very dangerous overt acts of racism by powerful people and majorities, diminishing very real institutional racism against minorities by making FALSE EQUIVALENCIES with much less impactful and potent acts. You can’t take the power dynamics out of the equation. And it’s not about whites. The aggressive, nationalist and often race inspired acts of Han Chinese, Indians, Saudis, Poles, Russians are all very problematic for their minorities. And their impactful shit shouldn’t be burried or silenced under « both sides » false equivalencies.

If, separately, you want to talk about sjw that goes overboard, that’s fine. I’ll agree with some and disagree with others. That thing about canceling Slav and whatnot was retarded to me. I think Norwegians should be able to run sushi AND curry joints if they damn well feel like it. Different things deserve to be analyzed and discussed on their own merits.

Trying to silence or water down very legitimate criticisms of dangerous racial baiting and scapegoating of minorities by governments and majorities because some random sjw said this or that is gross. Seriously, I think you are in good faith. I think you are a smart guy. Can’t you see what you’re doing? Don’t call nazis out because, hey, this jewish guy is racist or oversensitive. Both sides! Hundreds of thousands of muslim Chinese are being forced into internment camps....hey both sides! The POTUS is the guy that started the birther movement, called south american migrants rapists and murderers, started his admin with a race baiting ban of travellers from muslim countries, has a large following amongst white supremacists he frequently caters to...hey random girl on twitter and sjw!

Come on!


I would answer something in the lines of I've never meant to makes equivalencies between real, systemic racism, and that cunty wong's tweets and that I was only trying to demonstrate how people on a certain left tend to think anyone who doesn't vote democrat is a racist while themselves being part of the problem by promoting garbage that in the end only helps to push people to the fringes... but I spent last night drinkin arak from the bottle in a pool and I can't make any significant intellectual effort right now.
User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 9280
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 151 times
Received rep: 471 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9187 by Dr_Chimera » Sun Aug 12, 2018 10:49 pm

Slick Nick wrote:I would answer something in the lines of I've never meant to makes equivalencies between real, systemic racism, and that cunty wong's tweets and that I was only trying to demonstrate how people on a certain left tend to think anyone who doesn't vote democrat is a racist while themselves being part of the problem by promoting garbage that in the end only helps to push people to the fringes... but I spent last night drinkin arak from the bottle in a pool and I can't make any significant intellectual effort right now.


I recall you saying this, Nick:

garbage like this should offend you as much as any racist garbage you hear from the fart-right


You definitely "horseshoe theoried" this one.
User avatar
Slick Nick
Registered Broad
Posts: 7016
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:40 pm
Has given rep: 907 times
Received rep: 568 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9188 by Slick Nick » Sun Aug 12, 2018 10:55 pm

How is "garbage from the fart-right" equivalent to systemic racism... we're talking about a bunch of incels on 4chan.
User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 9280
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 151 times
Received rep: 471 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9189 by Dr_Chimera » Sun Aug 12, 2018 10:58 pm

Slick Nick wrote:How is "garbage from the fart-right" equivalent to systemic racism... we're talking about a bunch of incels on 4chan.


Incels who celebrate systemic racism.
User avatar
Slick Nick
Registered Broad
Posts: 7016
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:40 pm
Has given rep: 907 times
Received rep: 568 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9190 by Slick Nick » Sun Aug 12, 2018 11:42 pm

Dog wrote:I was talking about the potus. Litterally, we were talking about « would americans learn anything new if a tape surfaced with Trump making racial slurs ». Then Jester replied that some people seem to really need to have it spelled out for them before they recognize racism. Then Slick posted some off-the-wall stuff from an asian chick. Then we were all like wtf are you talking about? Then he was like, SJWs suck! Then we were like, wtf are you talking about!

You guys were talking about incels?

:why:


to be honest a barely read those posts and really just focused on this sentence:

have a narrow understanding of racism. It needs to be really explicit before they'll grasp it.


which I quoted.
User avatar
Slick Nick
Registered Broad
Posts: 7016
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:40 pm
Has given rep: 907 times
Received rep: 568 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9191 by Slick Nick » Mon Aug 13, 2018 12:28 am

Dog wrote:
Slick Nick wrote:
Dog wrote:I was talking about the potus. Litterally, we were talking about « would americans learn anything new if a tape surfaced with Trump making racial slurs ». Then Jester replied that some people seem to really need to have it spelled out for them before they recognize racism. Then Slick posted some off-the-wall stuff from an asian chick. Then we were all like wtf are you talking about? Then he was like, SJWs suck! Then we were like, wtf are you talking about!

You guys were talking about incels?

:why:


to be honest a barely read those posts and really just focused on this sentence:

have a narrow understanding of racism. It needs to be really explicit before they'll grasp it.


which I quoted.


He was talking about people still blind to Trump’s racism. People that would have to hear him say explicit horrific shit on tape to see it. He wasn’t talking about Norwegian sushi shops.

Do you consider Trump a racist, Nick?


As I said, I didn't read the stream of posts. Sometimes I just want to strip up some talk, I find it amusing.

I think Trump says a lot of putrid things but I don't think he's the hardcore racist some try to portray him to be...

he likes Russians too, the most vilified race on this planet.. pretty open guy in the end.

:trump:
User avatar
chicpea
Registered Broad
Posts: 6433
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:09 pm
Location: lagoons or ditches
Has given rep: 732 times
Received rep: 467 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9192 by chicpea » Mon Aug 13, 2018 11:16 am

Don't worry. You won't get beheaded.

User avatar
chicpea
Registered Broad
Posts: 6433
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:09 pm
Location: lagoons or ditches
Has given rep: 732 times
Received rep: 467 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9193 by chicpea » Mon Aug 13, 2018 11:48 am

Dog wrote:words I agree with



This is someone I can get behind. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sen-tim-ka ... king-them/
User avatar
mcphee
Registered Broad
Posts: 13517
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:27 am
Has given rep: 137 times
Received rep: 407 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9194 by mcphee » Mon Aug 13, 2018 12:13 pm

I don’t think Trump is a racist but how I’d define it . I don’t think he sees or thinks about race in any detailed manner other than how taking a position reflects on him. I think people forget that. He seems to see everything by his own reflection.

The old Hitler line about ‘well he kept the trains on time’ relates to him. Any murderous dictator is judged by ‘well, he’s always been nice to me,

Now, he’s used by many who have deep down racial issues, but Trump doesn’t like anyone unless they benefit him. He’ll say racially insensitive shit but I doubt he understands it
User avatar
Craig
Registered Broad
Posts: 18120
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:33 pm
Location: Toronto
Has given rep: 30 times
Received rep: 375 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9195 by Craig » Mon Aug 13, 2018 12:16 pm

Trump's Dad was an oldschool, hardcore racist. It's hard for me to believe that a guy who has led that insular a life has that different a world view.
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 7072
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 134 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9196 by jester » Mon Aug 13, 2018 1:26 pm

Dog wrote:
Slick Nick wrote:I think Trump says a lot of putrid things but I don't think he's the hardcore racist some try to portray him to be...


He’s always struck me as more of a sociopathic opportunist than anything else. Not really an ideologue. More of a massive manipulative cunt. Along with the “Muslim travel ban” designed to set the tone to start his admin and throw red meat to that faction of the populace, his first official visit was to Saudi Arabia...

Thing is, I don’t think that matters that much (whether he’s an ideologue racist vs opportunistic putrid human). I think it’s crystal clear that a central part of his “strategy” is race baiting -fanning and preying on people’s fears and prejudices of minorities to gain/consolidate support. It’s not new, it’s always ugly to me when done, but he’s taken it to a whole new level -at least by post WWII western standards. Albeit he may not himself be of the hardcore ideologue variety, prominent members of his staff seem to be - notably Stephan Miller.

Trump started his political ascendency by becoming the chief spokesperson for the profoundly racist birther movement, made hyperbolic statements to stoke fears of and dehumanize southern american migrants and muslims - notably, his central themes of portraying migrants as principally murderers, rapists and other assorted dangerous low lives, his repeated rallying cry for a Wall (that’s more a rallying cry/symbolism than an actual practical thing), cumulating, so far, in that cynical and absolutely outrageous policy of child separation.

I think a discussion on immigation is important and legitimate. That’s not the issue. The issue is how he frames the debate -it is very clearly framed in an overly racist manner. Whether that’s out of personal concinction or cynical political opportunism, to me, is not that inportant. His administration, in its words and deeds, is racist and it is so in an inflammatory manner. As to his own personal convinctions, I think that it’s the same as for most of his positions -incoherent and inconsistent.


Wealthy folks have generally remained aloof from public presentations of virulent racism simply because their wealth shielded them from the rough edges of racial interaction. If your country club doesn't let blacks or Jews in, you don't need to talk about how you don't like Jews and blacks. Why be uncivil? They were still racist.

At some point his rhetoric and actions (over years) are what they are. This is particularly true when you are an executive overseeing policies with racist overtones, and ran a campaign with numerous baldly racist pronouncements (including its announcement!).

At some point you lose the benefit of the doubt. Whether that's due to personal ideology or moral failing, it doesn't matter.
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 7072
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 134 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9197 by jester » Mon Aug 13, 2018 1:30 pm

Craig wrote:Trump's Dad was an oldschool, hardcore racist. It's hard for me to believe that a guy who has led that insular a life has that different a world view.


Yeah, people forget this ... and he has some definite dad issues if you ever see a personal profile that touches on his relationship with the man. Moreover, he's had *numerous* opportunities to to demonstrate that he isn't racist and failed to do so. I mean, seriously, whenever he has to clean up his racist comments (post Charlottesville, for example) it looks like a hostage video. Some of that is clearly his inability to apologize/admit error ... but there's insincerity there, too.
User avatar
AD
Posts: 23483
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Here
Has given rep: 511 times
Received rep: 612 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9198 by AD » Mon Aug 13, 2018 2:42 pm

Dog wrote:
Slick Nick wrote:I think Trump says a lot of putrid things but I don't think he's the hardcore racist some try to portray him to be...


He’s always struck me as more of a sociopathic opportunist than anything else. Not really an ideologue. More of a massive manipulative cunt. Along with the “Muslim travel ban” designed to set the tone to start his admin and throw red meat to that faction of the populace, his first official visit was to Saudi Arabia...

Thing is, I don’t think that matters that much (whether he’s an ideologue racist vs opportunistic putrid human). I think it’s crystal clear that a central part of his “strategy” is race baiting -fanning and preying on people’s fears and prejudices of minorities to gain/consolidate support. It’s not new, it’s always ugly to me when done, but he’s taken it to a whole new level -at least by post WWII western standards. Albeit he may not himself be of the hardcore ideologue variety, prominent members of his staff seem to be - notably Stephan Miller.

Trump started his political ascendency by becoming the chief spokesperson for the profoundly racist birther movement, made hyperbolic statements to stoke fears of and dehumanize southern american migrants and muslims - notably, his central themes of portraying migrants as principally murderers, rapists and other assorted dangerous low lives, his repeated rallying cry for a Wall (that’s more a rallying cry/symbolism than an actual practical thing), cumulating, so far, in that cynical and absolutely outrageous policy of child separation.

I think a discussion on immigation is important and legitimate. That’s not the issue. The issue is how he frames the debate -it is very clearly framed in an overly racist manner. Whether that’s out of personal concinction or cynical political opportunism, to me, is not that inportant. His administration, in its words and deeds, is racist and it is so in an inflammatory manner. As to his own personal convinctions, I think that it’s the same as for most of his positions -incoherent and inconsistent.





Come on dog... that's way too long of an analysis to say "Racist is as racist does".

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define. ... pid%20does
User avatar
jester
Registered Broad
Posts: 7072
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:38 pm
Has given rep: 10 times
Received rep: 134 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9199 by jester » Mon Aug 13, 2018 3:27 pm

It would help greatly if politicians of all stripes got serious about some of the core elements here, and stopped spewing sugary BS. For example, we need to accept that the US economy c. 1950 is gone and never coming back. Both Bernie and Trump were very guilty of appealing to that bit of delusion, but they are far from alone.

This is a dynamic of great importance to Western economies where the population has grown accustomed to the spoils of the last three centuries. Future looks very different than that.
User avatar
Dr_Chimera
Registered Broad
Posts: 9280
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:50 pm
Has given rep: 151 times
Received rep: 471 times

Re: Murrica: fuck yeah

Post #9200 by Dr_Chimera » Mon Aug 13, 2018 3:41 pm

jester wrote:It would help greatly if politicians of all stripes got serious about some of the core elements here, and stopped spewing sugary BS. For example, we need to accept that the US economy c. 1950 is gone and never coming back. Both Bernie and Trump were very guilty of appealing to that bit of delusion, but they are far from alone.


Jester, you never fail to be utterly vacuous.

Return to “Le mur de messages”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests