2018-19 Season Reputation Level / Net Repuation

[Boring Choice #2]

Hi Everyone! As you know, I've been working on and off as the unofficial Broads data analytics expert. Previously, I had just provided my rankings of posters based on my observances and history of reading Broads and previous hockey discussion boards (eye test). As with hockey, things have developed and some people insist that there are better ways of measuring performance than just with your eye. In that vain, a couple of months back, with some input by some really fine Broads, I developed a set of #fancystats to be able to objectively rank our fine Broads. I did a first run of those stats back in April as a test run based on a fixed set of data at a point in time on April 21, 2017.

Now that the hockey season is finished (congratulations to the Penguins on their back-to-back Cup wins), I've decided to update the stats, including the inputs into that data. They are based on fixed data as of approximately 9:00 on this morning - June 9, 2017.

Reputation Level is defined as following: RL = (RG * RR%) / ALF
or in detail:
RL = (Rep Given x (Rep Received / Total Rep) ) / (Likeability Factor x (Days Inactive in Excess of One Week + 1) )

The post following will contain the results, both for today and the previous ranking.



The input data are as follows:

RGPP - Rep Given per Post
RRPP - Rep Received per Post
NRPP - Net Rep per Post
RG% - Rep Given as a percentage of total rep (given and received)
RR% - Rep Received as a percentage of total rep
DIOW - Days Inactive (> One Week)
DIOW+1 - Days Inactive (> One Week) + 1 [for use in denominator]
LF - Likeability Factor (a=1.00, b=1.50, c=2.5, d=4.5, e=8.5) [e.g. c = b + ( ( b - a ) x 2 ) ] ... starting point before a was 0.5 {see POSCAT below}
ALF - Active Likeability Factor (DIOW+1 x LF)



Posting category (POSCAT) in which i am placing posters
a - generally beloved throughout the broads
b - generally beloved withing their subset of broads
c - neither really loved nor hated either within their subset or throughout the broads
d - generally unliked outside their subset
e - generally unliked both throughout the broads

[Boring Choice #2]

Here is the link:

Code: Select all

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15JDCxM4nxkdh0NLAvu4G1AJMPmHWee57GhmfNtLtEMA/edit?usp=sharing

edIt: having trouble with the link. will do a manual copy shortly.

USERNAME RL (Rep Level)
Dog 678.4087
vonbonds 509.3861
AD 335.7392
edgar_dong 288.1840
TreasonWeasel 282.9125
flâ·neur 278.5311
Mufasa 254.4693
Scottish Play Poster 254.1094
chicpea 222.2111
clawfirst 173.5244
åboriginal 168.7721
Retardé S 168.0789
Boring Choice #2 166.6667
Twitter bArt 163.8321
senate 160.1588
GM17 144.8974
Slick Nick 135.1739
Walter White 133.8899
mcphee 112.5763
MP 111.8797
mayoradamwest 109.0887
vf 102.1762
The Bytown Boozer 96.7150
PredsFan77 96.3347
Rockie 89.9076
Curry Rage 86.3792
Dr_Chimera 85.9643
Thomas Malthus 70.5416
NICO NICO PANIC 69.9057
Tao Jones 67.3510
Arnold Landry 66.9187
Mike. 55.2000
LeafOfBread 53.9416
Dr. Doom 53.7682
Transplanted Caper 49.8667
VLoo 46.0428
TittiesNBeer 43.0777
Philthy Thrillz 41.3869
Gay4Clemmer 38.3136
R-66Y 36.5972
WTF 36.2921
cawbber 35.6164
Getzo 34.3099
stoney 33.9204
CerebralGenesis 33.4758
Hosei 32.8665
Germz 32.3700
Not 32.3613
PPJ 32.2712
da god 31.6746
Dynrehab 26.4372
AGENT ZERO 25.6707
paulster 23.7292
MonkeyWrench 23.6900
Ricard_Persson 23.4965
Balki Bartokomous 23.1362
Whit Dickman 21.2428
CFD 20.6769
Dat Boi 20.3307
IcE ColD 17.7778
JLHockeyKnight 16.9180
CantSeeColors 12.4675
Geo 11.8514
Nobak 10.7027
Rogers Pancreas 9.7785
Vector 9.7255
selyar 9.3958
LC 8.3571
Craig 7.8561
Calvin's Duplicate 7.7507
Konecny HypeTrain Captain 7.4469
Zardoz 6.6240
jester 6.0714
mooseOAK 5.9472
Hovercraft 5.8983
deLOUsional 5.7993
19nazzy 5.4054
Murphy 5.1964
DeadPhish 4.9412
PEli 4.3457
TGR 4.0476
Kilgore Trout 3.6324
GoneFullHextall 3.5037
The Ders 2.9786
Jkrdevil 2.8800
Lifer 2.8138
MiD 2.2400
Krinkle 2.0108
chaosof99 1.8857
guyincognito 1.1122
Jimmy Rustlin' Dowd 1.0839

[AD]

You can only count posts since the rep system has existed. Previous posts under the old rep system pre-purge cannot be counted for current RRPP numbers.

[pk shredz]

I have some time to do some rep removal. Take your time BigD. No rush.

Someone delete all my posts that werent repped too. Thanks.

[pk shredz]

I think you should add in years on the board to the equation.

[Boring Choice #2]

I think you should add in years on the board to the equation.

that is taken care of in using total posts, which provides insight into the poster's relative activity on broads versus other posters.

[pk shredz]

your current status fits you perfectly. completely even.

[Boring Choice #2]

You can only count posts since the rep system has existed. Previous posts under the old rep system pre-purge cannot be counted for current RRPP numbers.

i think post counts only include those made since bonbons blew up the place. in any case, other posts counts are inconsequential.

[Boring Choice #2]

your current status fits you perfectly. completely even.

I was happy to have an even number of rep given and received, so people would be able to find a comparison to a relatively neutral poster.

[AD]

You can only count posts since the rep system has existed. Previous posts under the old rep system pre-purge cannot be counted for current RRPP numbers.

i think post counts only include those made since bonbons blew up the place. in any case, other posts counts are inconsequential.

No. Post counts go back to pre-meaningless rep days. So you should them from that number otherwise my 50,000 posts pre-meaningless rep simply dilute the magnificence that are my post-meaningless rep prose.

[Boring Choice #2]

you just don't like the results because it shows that you are half the poster the dog is.

[pk shredz]

[Boring Choice #2]

you just don't like the results because it shows that you are half the poster the dog is.

i don't mind being half the poster you are, for instance.

[AD]

you just don't like the results because it shows that you are half the poster the dog is.

You just dislike my position because it shows you're half the accountant dog is.

[pk shredz]

you just don't like the results because it shows that you are half the poster the dog is.

You just dislike my position because it shows you're half the accountant dog is.

[pk shredz]

you just don't like the results because it shows that you are half the poster the dog is.

i don't mind being half the poster you are, for instance.

[Boring Choice #2]

you just don't like the results because it shows that you are half the poster the dog is.

You just dislike my position because it shows you're half the accountant dog is.

if i'm lucky.

[PredsFan77]

whoa

[Dr_Chimera]

Likeability Factor

Shut the fuck up, dumbass.

[pk shredz]

Lol. I should be disqualified anyways. I think 15 percent or so is from a name I won't speak of.

The whole thing should be thrown out because of BigD in the top-ten. Unless there is some board I magically can't see he's enjoyable in.

[Boring Choice #2]

Lol. I should be disqualified anyways. I think 15 percent or so is from a name I won't speak of.

The whole thing should be thrown out because of BigD in the top-ten. Unless there is some board I magically can't see he's enjoyable in.

I'm at 13 with 166.66666666666666666...

[pk shredz]

I fucking glanced because I couldn't keep my eyes on the monstrosity. Is the spreadsheet done? I want one where I can make some changes.

[pk shredz]

I did enjoy taking three hours to locate one MooseOak on the list.



I love ya Moose. I'm joshin.

[Boring Choice #2]

I fucking glanced because I couldn't keep my eyes on the monstrosity. Is the spreadsheet done? I want one where I can make some changes.

susf. like i'm going to let people touch my spreadsheets.

[pk shredz]

how big was that susf?

[vonbonds]

how big was that susf?

Check the affair thread

[pk shredz]

Im making a remix to 8675309 with vonbonds number.

5-0-9 3-8-6-1 "Vonny"

[PredsFan77]

i think this is rigged for habs/leafs/devils fans

[PEli]

I don't think this is fair because I'm pretty sure klingsor is dead and that's where I get all of my rep.

[Dr_Chimera]

I miss receiving 400 rep points from klingsorn

[Dr_Chimera]

Receiving 300-some rep points from broads population = pravda

Getting twice that amount from kingsgorn for one post = istina

[pk shredz]

I missed being in the billions. I felt like a philanthropist.

Then vonbonds broke it all.

[Boring Choice #2]

i think this is rigged for habs/leafs/devils fans

So you think that it is biased towards 90% of the posts /posters on this site. Are you sure you didn't want to add the Sens fans and make it 98.75%?

[PredsFan77]

yeah but the sens fans are cool so it's understandable

[Boring Choice #2]

It's more likely that they are as stingy with their reputation giving as Melnyk was doling out cash to his star defenceman.

[pk shredz]

So a healthy count of giving is considered a plus in your master of analytics game? Explains why that cheapskate DF is so low.

[clawfirst]

I thought reading his posts explained it pretty well.

[pk shredz]

reading his posts

[senate]

It's more likely that they are as stingy with their reputation giving as Melnyk was doling out cash to his star defenceman.

I was too generous with giving out rep so some killjoy mod erased all of it that wasn't given out to Hab posters.

[senate]

Or at least that is how I choose to remember it.

[Dr_Chimera]

I can't be a better poster than Germz. So this is obviously quackery.

[pk shredz]

A good man knows his faults. You sir, are a good man.

[chicpea]

Yes. Silknorg was a fine specimen. RIP Silknorg.

[pk shredz]

Chiclet, has consecutive twos which indicates to me he's on the rise and in the hunt for the top-5 spot. If Craig didn't delete my post count, I'd be in the lower abyss of the list.

[vonbonds]

I missed being in the billions. I felt like a philanthropist.

Then vonbonds broke it all.

[Retardé S]

So what is the stat that really matters here?

[Boring Choice #2]

12

[pk shredz]

12

I've done my fair share of rep-whoring, so with that being said, that is low. Reaaaaaaaal low.

[mayoradamwest]

So what is the stat that really matters here?

Hugs.

[MP]

So what is the stat that really matters here?

Apparently giving rep to superior posters is as important as receiving rep as superior poster.

It's like saying the Sens will be good this year because they let everyone score a lot of goals.